Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Need Help On 1968-S-1970-S Jefferson Nickel About Full Steps ?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 9,545Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Ricardocody's Avatar
United States
1204 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  02:15 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Ricardocody to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Last night I was making together a set of proof nickels from roll search then I realize these 2 coins were not proofs and also remember that the 68-70s with full steps have a good premium . So my question is .. Are these coins in enough good condition to be called full steps ? Give me your opinion !

1968S. Hard to believe but not a proof coin
Need-Help-On-1968-S-1970-S-Jefferson-Nickel-About-Full-Steps-? Need-Help-On-1968-S-1970-S-Jefferson-Nickel-About-Full-Steps-? Need-Help-On-1968-S-1970-S-Jefferson-Nickel-About-Full-Steps-?

1970S. Also hard to believe not a proof because they have mirror proof like !

Is it worth to send them to slab as a fs or not ?
Need-Help-On-1968-S-1970-S-Jefferson-Nickel-About-Full-Steps-? Need-Help-On-1968-S-1970-S-Jefferson-Nickel-About-Full-Steps-? Need-Help-On-1968-S-1970-S-Jefferson-Nickel-About-Full-Steps-? Need-Help-On-1968-S-1970-S-Jefferson-Nickel-About-Full-Steps-?

*** Edited by Staff - Fixed Photobucket images ***
Pillar of the Community
Ricardocody's Avatar
United States
1204 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  02:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ricardocody to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The only way to tell they are not proof is because they have not the cameo frost on the bust and on the montcello .
Pillar of the Community
Darth Anarchus's Avatar
United States
1388 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  09:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Darth Anarchus to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
it looks like the 68-S is FS, but the 70-S has 2 hits that would keep it from FS designation. The 68 could bring a high grade is you were going to slab it, it's very beautiful tho. Just my humble opinion tho, I would wait for the experts
Valued Member
SPQR's Avatar
United States
327 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  09:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SPQR to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That '68 is fabulous! Certainly an MS FS grade!
Irrespective of full steps or not, either of these years in this condition are a great find. The dies got a workout and there are a lot of mushy strikes.
Pillar of the Community
Ricardocody's Avatar
United States
1204 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  10:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ricardocody to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I though about worn dies maybe I ll try to slab these but before would appreciate any advise and thanks for the opinion .
Pillar of the Community
KenRingold's Avatar
United States
594 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  10:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KenRingold to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
IMO, if I intend on selling them, I'd probably have them slabbed. If I'm keeping them, I'd stick them in an airtite and smile.
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  12:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Both of them are proofs- look at the rims. Proofs from this period do not always have cameo contrast so you cannot use that as the only indicator. Proof rims are always sharp and squared even if the coin has been lightly circulated.
Pillar of the Community
Ricardocody's Avatar
United States
1204 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  2:52 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ricardocody to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
They are very sharp strikes so they are going to my proof set then
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  5:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The only way to tell they are not proof is because they have not the cameo frost on the bust and on the montcello .

Quote:
Proofs from this period do not always have cameo contrast so you cannot use that as the only indicator.
Correct. My 1968 to 1971 proof nickels lack cameo, and it is very weak on the 1972 to 1976 proofs. There is a huge contrast between the 1976 and 1977 coins.

By the way, these were all broken out of proof sets by moi.

Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  7:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TNG to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow, I thought these were business strikes and had to delete my post I had here.
The more I look at the field surface under the steps and above MONTICELLO the more I can see the smooth mirror like surface that still kind of shows.
Edited by TNG
03/07/2011 7:15 pm
Valued Member
SPQR's Avatar
United States
327 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  7:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SPQR to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Mmmmm...I'm not convinced on the '68.
The 70, ok, maybe.
The 68 just looks like a really nice business strike to me.
Then again I'm blind in one eye and can't out of the other.
Edited by SPQR
03/07/2011 7:23 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15392 Posts
 Posted 03/07/2011  9:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Apologize for the late reply ...

No disrespect to the OP ... but the quality of the photos are confusing us. Clear accurate photos ... which we all strive for ... should show mirror surfaces of a proof-strike coin.

IMHO ... these are both proof strike coins ...

I base my view on what I can see ... square rims ... bold strike and both bold features and lettering.

Ricardacody .... cameo is not the positive indicator of proof strike coins of this era ...


Quote:
The only way to tell they are not proof is because they have not the cameo frost on the bust and on the montcello .


Look for the true indicators of proof strike ... bold rims ... mirror surfaces ... bold everything.

Am not able to offer a grade opinion from the photos ... but I suggest you save them in your Jefferson Proof collection and be happy to have them.

David
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Pillar of the Community
fioti's Avatar
United States
4212 Posts
 Posted 07/11/2012  12:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fioti to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
VERY nice '68! I've seen FS easily clear 200+. Dont let the proofness bum you out. There are over a dozen double dies. I too, have been fooled by these dates.
Pillar of the Community
ratio411's Avatar
United States
1208 Posts
 Posted 07/11/2012  12:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ratio411 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
IMO, which is far from perfect...

The 70 is a proof.
The 68 could be a business strike.
Not only is it lacking proof surfaces, which many proofs then had substandard surfaces,
but the rims are not nearly as wide, sharp, and square as the 70. Tough call. Certainly
a beautiful nickel if a business strike. I admit, it could be a proof, but it could just
as easily be a very nice business strike. I'd hang on to that one.
  Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 9,545Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums