| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,753 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
459 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
No.. never have.. How do you get such nice pics? Good job. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
459 Posts |
Just set camera to macro and used 100 watt bulb for the first one. The second is the same thing except taken through the eye piece of a microscope.
I think this one would have graded pretty high except for the damage, any time I can see all four marks on both Xs on the crown the rest is usually in pretty good shape.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4000 Posts |
That's very cool!  Dang shame about the damage, though.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
459 Posts |
Oddly enough it is not all bad. I collect varieties not always best quality coins, so at least I got it cheap. This one was just $1. So very cool for less than a cup of coffee. The Canadian Victorian cents are full of this kind of stuff. To each his own, I guess.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Very cool! I recall some other 25c and 50c having repunched letters in Canada. Usually Heaton mint. Since I don't see similar doubling on nearby letters, would this letter be repunched individually?  That one curved mark from the left serif to the vertical strikes me as a hand-tool mark. I also see a die crack through the N too.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
459 Posts |
The left bottom serif on the N in Canada and the N in Regina on all of the 1876 cents had that curved single serif ending. I would guess that the next issue or two, which in this case was 1881 then 1882 inherited some of the problems from the previous matrix. Obviously attempts were made to fix it. I'll need to look at the Turner books to see his explaination, I'm sure he has one, but this is the first one like this I have seen. Endless variety in this series...
Edited by nybird 04/01/2011 3:31 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Thanks Nybird--good to know!  Something sure looks re-tooled there. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Quote: I also see a die crack through the N too You know, I was looking at the N for the repunch that I didn't even notice the die crack, nice one too. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
493 Posts |
That is one of my favorites for '82
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
I like that "N", also. I don't know which one it is, but it won't make any difference, I keep all of them, and especially, die cracks. I like tha picture through the 'scope.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
459 Posts |
I learned the "through the scope" method here, it is easy, looks good and is usually pretty clear. I just hold camera lens right where my eye would be.
Edited by nybird 04/02/2011 7:01 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
I do that too--but your shots are superior to mine. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
459 Posts |
I don't know much about cameras or microscopesbut, if this helps. I use a canon 3.1 mp point and shoot camera, with a basic stereo microscope set to 45x. (15x eyepieces with 3x objective. I must admit when I first read the suggestion here I had my doubts but it is pretty simple.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,753 |
|