| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,384 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1109 Posts |
For Lincoln cents, I consider wheats to be classic and Memorial and newer to be modern. Just my opinion.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189919 Posts |
Quote:So is the LMC modern or classic? According to CCF, that is how we have the forums separated, both the Memorial cent and Wheat cent are modern. Some call the Memorials modern and the Wheaties classic (as mentioned by skyshark124). NumisMedia places the divide between 1933 and 1934.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
I think it varies per coin. As pointed out many folks do divide the pennies by LWC and LMC. That would be 59. It would be 46 for the dimes and 32 for the quarters and 38 for the nickels. I say 64 for the halves, and 35 for the dollars. That pretty much dovetails with jbucks I see dead people rule excepting the pennies and halves.
Edited by smokeriderdon 08/14/2013 5:36 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
I look at it like PCGS and fadetoblack does, silver is classic and clad is modern. For Lincolns Id have the wheats as classic and the memorial as modern.
I think the time has passed to consider a Franklin modern anymore as well. Its been 50 years since one has been made, thats not really old but it is half a century and almost lifetime has passed since theyve been minted. If their modern lifetime isn't over yet it should be soon. I suspect that their designation is largely a generational thing. If you grew up with them theyre modern, if you didnt theyre classic.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189919 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
I agree about the dime, they bore me to death at this point. Luckily theyre my least favorite denomination and they come in the mint sets and just go into the album every year.
Its a fair point about the Franklin being started later, when I consider classification I only concern myself with the end date though. Its hard to make an argument for something being a classic as a whole if its still being made which is why I go off of dates more than the design itself. Even if the Lincoln hadnt been changed at all I would consider those early 1900/pre WWII dates to be classics.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
My opinion for what it is worth.... classic ends for each denomination that was designed in the 18th century. Cents end with IHC's, Nickels with Liberty's....etcetera. Moderns were designed 20th century...Post Modern 21st century....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1109 Posts |
I just have a hard time considering a 1909 Lincoln Wheat cent "modern." Can't really wrap my head around a 104 year-old coin being called modern. I mean, that cent came out before my grandparents were born, and they are both dead now, after decently long lives.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
477 Posts |
Of course in an act of blatant stupidity I asked this question without paying any attention to the thread description written below the titles clearly stating which coin fits in which class. I must pay more attention.
Rick
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189919 Posts |
Quote: Its hard to make an argument for something being a classic as a whole if its still being made which is why I go off of dates more than the design itself. I can understand this.  Quote:classic ends for each denomination that was designed in the 18th century. Cents end with IHC's, Nickels with Liberty's....etcetera. Moderns were designed 20th century...Post Modern 21st century.... I can understand this as well.  Quote:I just have a hard time considering a 1909 Lincoln Wheat cent "modern." Can't really wrap my head around a 104 year-old coin being called modern. It is not so difficult after looking at ancient or even medieval coins. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1109 Posts |
Quote:Quote: I just have a hard time considering a 1909 Lincoln Wheat cent "modern." Can't really wrap my head around a 104 year-old coin being called modern. It is not so difficult after looking at ancient or even medieval coins. Well, I was speaking relatively.  I think it is interesting to see how many varying opinions there are on such a simple question. Guess it goes to show how differently everyone sees the hobby.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189919 Posts |
Quote: Well, I was speaking relatively. I know. I was just being silly.  Quote: Guess it goes to show how differently everyone sees the hobby. Very true. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2805 Posts |
At least Canadian coins are easy: every denomination was designed in 1937 (although the half has seen certain revisions), and the loonie and toonie are modern. The only hitch is the silver/nickel dollar series: I guess 1935-1967 is "classic" and 1968-1986 is "modern".
Before that, every denomination featured a nice wreath.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
For my part, I feel that the "modern" coin era began when the first steam coin press replaced human power at the US Mint, in 1836! 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,384 |
Page 2 of 2
|