| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,859 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1249 Posts |
Nice clash but also very nice condition Half Cent. Wrong catagory cause its no way modern but still great coin to show off ;) |
|
Valued Member
United States
259 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1599 Posts |
Yep, wrong category, maybe mod will move.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
jprine -  clash on a Half Cent is too cool! Was wondering about the orientation of the overlay. Currently seems to show medal orientation. Is that what you were going for? Not to familiar with the Half Cent, but thought they had a coin orientation to them. Which would mean rotating the overlay 180 degrees. I think your description of the overlay process (rotate the image 180 then flip vertically) is right if the overlay image started out facing up before being applied to the second image facing up. I could be wrong and probably messed up the explanation. Thanks, Doug. edit: I'm still in learning mode about overlays so I'm trying to get it right.... Adding that applies to coin orientation and not medal orientation, which I think would skip the rotation step. Edited by Halo1st
09/08/2015 11:15 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3546 Posts |
Could this clash be considered a variety? Since die cracks, for example, contribute to some VAM numeric designations why couldn't a 1/2 cent clash also have its own varietal classification? After all, both involve some aspect of the die etc... |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1599 Posts |
Interesting thought! Any opinions..........
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Very interesting. I think the author has the overlay orientation correct.
Edited by Coinfrog
09/14/2015 4:20 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote:Could this clash be considered a variety? Since die cracks, for example, contribute to some VAM numeric designations why couldn't a 1/2 cent clash also have its own varietal classification? No. If you have a pair of dies striking coins that is a specific variety. Just because those two dies come together without a planchet between them does NOT make subsequent coins from those des a different variety. A different die state yes, but not a different varety. Die cracks can be used as identifying features for a variety sometimes (because sometimes a variety always comes with a given crack and no two cracks are identical.) but clash marks should never be used to identify a variety because you can have a pair of dies with no clash, with a clash, and then after the clash has either worn or been polished off. Coins struck from all three of these are all the same variety, just different stages. Or you can two pair of dies and both pairs clash. Both pairswill produce coins with identical or near identical clashmarks but they are different varieties. That is one of the problems with VAM's sometimes. For awhile they were giving VAM variety number based solely on clashmarks. If the clashmarks fade the VAM goes away. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
526 Posts |
I agree, die clashes are an error and not a variety. The only distinction that I make is the modern die clash which is 1836 to present and the die clash that was not a mechanical error; pre 1836 for U. S. coins. As for overlays; U. S. coins and other foreign countries using the coin strike die position, 180 degrees between the obverse and reverse faces and then flipped horizontally. Countries that use the medallic strike die position, just flipped horizontally.  Just for my curiosity, I did an overlay. Turns out that there was a rotation of 12 degrees between the two dies when they clashed. BJ Neff Edited by BJ Neff
09/15/2015 10:47 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
297 Posts |
Try flipping like this-then match up  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1599 Posts |
BJ, you were correct on the rotation. Thanks for clarifying the rotation and flip for the overlay, I was completely wrong. I won't make that mistake again, hopefully. Thanks!   |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
594 Posts |
Well explained Condor ...... I agree.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9793 Posts |
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
CCF Sponsor
United States
702 Posts |
Beautiful! Very pretty coin.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,859 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/07/2015 7:41 pm
