| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,042 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18696 Posts |
the 84(O)'s were some of the best strikes at N.O. this one is pretty good. you have some nice luster all around. the blotchy toning may be hiding some surface marks etc but the fields look PL to me. MS64PL possible CAM
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
The coin looks MS64 PL, but the PL and DMPL designation can not be accurately graded from photos.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19210 Posts |
Nice. MS64 PL resonates with me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5887 Posts |
Looks straight to me. A beauty for sure.
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
Edited by CoinHunter27
06/06/2021 9:53 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2341 Posts |
Quote:
My own opinion is cleaned Nobody here thus far has said cleaned...something you're seeing in hand that we're not? I'm not a Morgan guy...but I would also agree...MS-64PL Cool one! smat |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3663 Posts |
Nice coin. The lines I see in the fields look like die polishing marks to me. I can't see anything that would hold this one back from a straight grade. I'll join the MS-64PL parade. This one could go DMPL, but that's almost impossible to determine from photos. Again, really nice coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
509 Posts |
Guess I'll go with the prevailing opinions then. Was looking at the field in front of Anna's face. Possible vertical cleaning swipes. Thanks all. Kinda put my mind at rest. To slab or not to slab?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
|
|
New Member
24 Posts |
I would say 63pl. Really not liking those deep scratches in front of libertys face
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5192 Posts |
I say MS63 PL, potentially DMPL. Yes, I would have it slabbed.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
Pl shows everything I think it's MS-64 Pl maybe dmpl but I have a hard time judging that
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Looks great to me. At least MS-64, probably PL, with a very good shot at 65. PL coins usually show marks in the fields more than a regular coin and this one looks super clean to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1005 Posts |
Agree with 64 PL straight grade
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
I think it's a MS63PL, probably not enough contrast to go DMPL. I think it was previously dipped and the odd colors seen are from it not being rinsed properly and toning is coming in blotchy due to that, it's not enough to go details for the old dip IMO, and other than that I see no other signs of cleaning or reasons it would be called a "details" coin.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,042 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/06/2021 3:49 pm
