| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,637 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
I don't see any wizzing either. The chiseling around the devices is usually labeled as "tooling."
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5675 Posts |
Odd to see that designation on a toned, circulated coin. Nice RPD!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
I would resubmit this coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
Nice Large Cent in my opinion. I would crack it out and put it in a 2X2 and just be happy with it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
Maybe whizzed, and re toned..
|
|
Valued Member
United States
68 Posts |
I dont see any whizzing. Usually, at least from my limited experience with whizzed coins. There will be a whole lot of hairline scratches, typically in circular patterns
|
|
Valued Member
United States
68 Posts |
I think id crack it out too. Sometimes the coins do get labeled wrong. Sometimes the grader makes mistakes too. Who knows
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6394 Posts |
Very nice photos!
The coin looks OK to me. Maybe the color is a little off and maybe there is a bit of glossy shine that is not original, but those are pretty minor criticisms. I agree there is little point in keeping this cent in this holder. It seems like a very harsh judgment for a pleasing copper coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
521 Posts |
Thank you, yes, I misspoke. The "chiseling" I referred to is properly called "tooling". So, "whizzing" is actually a type of smoothing, right?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
From an old NGC article Quote:
Whizzing is created when a mechanical wire brush is taken to the surface of a coin at high speed. The result is a coin that has the appearance of brilliant luster but is distinctly not mint created luster. I agree that this coin doesn't look whizzed; perhaps they mis-coded it and meant cleaned? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Whizzing is done, usually by a rotary tool with a fine abrasive wheel, to simulate mint luster. It's usually done on below MS coins (XF-AU) in n attempts to make them look MS. I also don't see obvious signs of whizzing, but it's possible the coin was handled after the process to attempt to hide the process with the oxidation.  . Like others, I'd crack it and keep it an album coin. Edit: kbbpll beat me to it Edited by Ty2020b
09/19/2021 1:07 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3662 Posts |
ANACS is really good about correcting labeling errors. Give them a call before you do anything. I sure don't see any evidence of whizzing. Possibly an old cleaning, but it looks market acceptable. Some scratches that may be considered graffiti, but that seems a stretch. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4418 Posts |
IMHO, this copper's a details coin. I concur with the majority that it doesn't appear to be whizzed, as labeled. I'd call it heavily buffed and artificially retoned. My guess is that the culprit may have been an autobody repairman ....  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
With respect, I see no evidence at all of this having been heavily buffed and retoned. None whatsoever.  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,637 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/18/2021 12:27 pm
