| Author |
Replies: 37 / Views: 4,077 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Can you made an XRF to the most closer goldsmith? If is slabbed you will have something 1% others elements but will be OK. The 4.806gr. is the minimal weigh. So if the Ni was replace with pure silver will be normal to be underweight. The normal what we say Silver Nickel personally I doubt they use only Silver at 999 purity, was the war time.
Let see the follows up.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96155 Posts |
@ Aliabeans: Thanks for posting this coin, it struck up a nice conversation about these war time nickels.
can you post up an image of the reverse for us?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
94 Posts |
If you goto Herritage Auction Website(Since that is where the 1942 Nickel was sold) Look up the nickel the Info to look it up is above and in whinformation of the coin it clearly states the composition of the coin and why it was special. I find it humorous that you all are so eager to shoot down my facts without even verifying them but sure I can goto their website for you and take a screen shot and then post it here for you. I just don't know why you are all so against me being right lol. AND my nickel isn't 4.8 grams its 4.6 grams. All my nickel needs to be when it gets tested to be a mint error due to the planchet is not have the correct composition. PCGS own website tells you what the type 1 and type 2 compositions are. So I strongly suggest reading more before trying to tell someone that they are wrong. Lastly yes I will gladly post the reverse as soon as it will let me I have used all my free pictures for today.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
94 Posts |
Here is verbatim copy of what is said on Herritage Auction Website about the nickeln good lord you all need to trust and have faith in women speech! lol 1942 Type One Nickel, Good 6 On a Silver Alloy Planchet Extremely Rare Transitional Error 1942 5C Type One -- Struck on a Silver Alloy Planchet -- Good 6 PCGS Secure. 4.7 gm. 1943-dated cents struck on copper planchets bring spectacular prices, but similar wartime wrong alloy transitional errors on Jefferson nickels are significantly rarer. Our online auction archives reveal only two examples, both 1944-P nickels struck on copper-nickel planchets (lot 5610 in our August 2001 Signature, and lot 10306 in our June 2004 Signature). The present lot is struck from sans-mintmark Type One dies, yet is struck in the silver alloy composition associated with the Type Two design bearing a large P mintmark above Monticello. This lightly marked cream-gray example displays wear on the motifs but the legends are fully readable and show only slight blending with the rim. Included with the lot is a two-page typed authentication letter, dated May 20, 1965, and signed in ink by Walter Breen, and a clipping of a June 16, 1965 Coin World article written by Breen that reported his determination.(Registry values: N1) Coin Index Numbers: (NGC ID# 22TK, PCGS# 4013) Weight: 5.00 grams Metal: 75% Copper, 25% Nickel
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Do you like bulling the peoples?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
94 Posts |
Now this article in itself from heritage auction and their information contradicts P CGS's own information because P CGS States that the type one and type 2 both have magnanies in it there are no 1940 nickels at all 41 42 43 44 and 435 that are 75% copper and 25% silver with no other alloys in its composition there are none so All my nickel has to be is not the composition that it's supposed to be according to P CGS and the US mint The only thing that made me look into this was when I weighed my nickel it was 4.6 g and I had just watched the video about  time nickel selling for almost $10000 mine had the same hue to it and just by chance it weighed basically the same so that's why I'm taking it analyzed by the machine so fingers cross I come out with a lucky lottery winner if not oh well But at least I tried and I didn't just toss it out. Hope this helps you all and please try to read through the things ice already stated I'm repeating myself quite a bit with duplicate info.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Please make the XRF test then you has the answer.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1657 Posts |
What you posted from Heritage is exactly the link I posted. Exactly where does it say 75% copper 25% silver? It doesn't! It says the coin is struck in the silver alloy composition associated with the type two design bearing a large P mintmark above Monticello. I will bow down and apologize in the middle of Times Square if you can show me where it says 75% copper 25% silver! Please highlight it. I wish you the best of luck with your coin, but sorry, it 100% normal.
Edited by lcutler 03/24/2023 05:39 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3471 Posts |
Quote: I have an appointment tomorrow morning at the coin shop that has a machine that will tell me what the composition is exactly How did it go at the coin shop, Aliabeans? What is the exact compostion of that nickel?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96155 Posts |
I would love to read the results when it is done.
Also can you please post up an image of the reverse?
Edited by Dearborn 03/24/2023 2:40 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5831 Posts |
Page 2 from what nickelsearcher saids.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
 I'm curious as well. Thanks, Doug.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
You still haven't answered my question about the big mint mark above the building. If it has that mint mark it's just a regular War Nickel.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96155 Posts |
Quote:You still haven't answered my question about the big mint mark above the building. If it has that mint mark it's just a regular War Nickel. This is the exact reason I'm hoping the OP will post up an image of the reverse. But I'm willing to bet he/she will not as to not get caught in a deception or possible embarrassing situation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
 Dearborn.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 37 / Views: 4,077 |
Page 3 of 3
|