| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,087 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19964 Posts |
WOW! A beautiful example! It's an easy EF-45 and maybe AU-50 IMO.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1256 Posts |
Nice! I'll bid and lose but I'll bid :)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
What a nice original looking coin! XF45 for sure. I'd PCGS or NGC that one Scoob.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
WOW .. very nice looking Lincoln.
I have a empty hole in my Dansco .. that coin would fill it just right
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1424 Posts |
Nice, where did you pick it up?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1213 Posts |
I'd put it at an XF45 and I hope if you submit it that I'm a bit low.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I agree it should go XF45 and should be slabbed.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
763 Posts |
If you are a member of PCGS, it would qualify for the free submission they are offering this quarter.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4000 Posts |
I'm not a member. I've been sending all of my coins to ANACS for the 5 coins for $95 economy deal. I'd have to weight whether it is worth becoming a member. I don't submit coins too often.
Usually, I only need one or two coins to be authenticated and throw in a few for grading just to meet the 5 coin minimum.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
57 Posts |
Is the mint mark really that far left on these older wheats?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189199 Posts |
The mint mark was applied to the die by hand, so its position can vary.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
The coin looks like it has been cleaned at some point. The surfaces look unnaturally shiny. If that's just the photo, so be it - that's all I have to go by. It's questionable whether PCGS would grade it, but that is certainly where it should be graded to maximize the return you are looking for. Having it graded by ANACS would be a waste of time and money in my opinion.
If the coin is natural and deemed so by PCGS, it would grade EF45, most likely. The detail appears to be solid AU, but the marks on the coin in various areas and the lack of luster would knock the market grade of the coin down to EF45. There is some chance the coin would come back in a "genuine" holder, indicating that the cleaning is apparent enough that they wouldn't grade it in a regular holder. At that point, it would probably sell for low-end EF money.
Just calling what I see in the image. If I had the coin in hand, I could come a lot closer to what they would likely do with it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4000 Posts |
Thanks Chuck.
I had decided to just hang on to it and not send it off. But, I'm curious as to why you said sending it to ANACS would be a waste of time. Do you not have confidence in their grading? Or is it something else?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
I personally have confidence in their grading - or at least I used to until they went through their wholesale offing of their staff. Most of their old staff went to ICG. Anyhow, this really has nothing to do with me, it's the confidence of the market at large in ANACS that is in the toilet. I doubt that will change any time soon. ANACS graded coins are largely viewed as raw and unauthenticated.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,087 |
Page 2 of 2
|