| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 3,116 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6116 Posts |
This was the best of the 7 error coins in a lot I recently won at auction. I have one pretty similar on a zinc cent, where they are more common, but wanted one on a copper cent. 1964 Lincoln Memorial cent Mint Error - uncentered broadstrike with indent showing brockage   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2736 Posts |
Wow, that's great, nice full date.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5239 Posts |
That's got to be one of the coolest coins I've ever seen.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4618 Posts |
I'm jealous!  Fantastic coin! ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!! 
|
|
Moderator
United States
34427 Posts |
This one is fantastic--lots going on with it!  "If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19201 Posts |
Enter it in one of CCF's contests as a giveaway.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2558 Posts |
Nice one first I've seen!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
That's a killer! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2156 Posts |
Such a cool one! Don't see too many on copper cents.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2738 Posts |
An attractive specimen. Standard hobby parlance dictates that we call the impression a "partial brockage" rather than an "indent with partial brockage". The term "indent" is reserved for impressions from unstruck planchets. Sorry, but I don't make the rules. Coop asked about the flange that is best seen on the reverse. This could be the result of a partial collar error, with expansion of coin metal well past the collar beneath the intrusive coin due to the increased effective striking pressure. It could also be the result of a "forced broadstrike", with the same factors governing the formation of the horizontal flange. I don't think it satisfies the requirements of "horizontal lipping", as this requires a coin to be struck fully within the collar. Views of the edge would clarify precisely which kind of error the flange represents (although they're all related).
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5887 Posts |
That's a beauty! Very large broadstrike and a killer brockage to boot. Congrats!
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6116 Posts |
Thanks all!!! And thanks Mike as I always learn more from your posts, and quite interesting to learn more about this coin and how it came to be. As for the edge and flange. I'll add two images of the edge at the flange, but unsure if this is sufficient to figure it out. The edge opposite the flange shows just the slightest offset from likely the collar?, and it gets mildly wider as you come around toward the flange and then peaks right at the flange as in the images. But even at the flange it's not terribly wide.   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3003 Posts |
congratulations tropicalbats much fun factor ... I will probably look at this a couple more times  |
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,116 |
Posted 05/27/2021 04:21 am
