| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,299 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not the best pics, but I'll say MS-63.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10047 Posts |
I was at 62, but can see a 63 be given. I tend to be hard on assessing halves.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2Edited by Earle42
11/20/2022 5:26 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19226 Posts |
Strong MS 63. Suggest flattening those staples...
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
MS-63 Because of obverse issues .
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18706 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4989 Posts |
I'll get a better holder for it found this one at a big antique store of all places. They had a tiny area of coins which were all crap except for this one. Was very reasonably priced.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7078 Posts |
With the reverse are you concerned about the arc indent running through the bell and into BUS (of pluribus) resulting in a details grade?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18706 Posts |
good eye Greasy Fingers. missed that and you may be correct.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
It does seem the bell has developed a new crack. Doubt I'd ever certify this particular coin but I think it would probably slip by as a contact mark. Not contiguous since there's nothing between the "BUS" and the bell.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Wow I missed that too, but I don't think it will detail the coin .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
Agree with others, MS-63.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
MS-62 at best with that reverse mark.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,299 |
|
Posted 11/20/2022 5:25 pm
