Coin Community Family of Web Sites Live Coin auctions starting as low as $1
Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our Youtube Channel! Check out our Twitter! Check out our Pinterest!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some coins?
Our coin forum is completely free! Register Now!

1964 P Washington FS-901 Proof Reverse

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 14 / Views: 278Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
United States
2312 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  4:51 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Willburton to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Ive taken a step back on posting my collection on here but I still I try to comment as much as I can!
This is an easy coin to post so here it is. I'm working on a set of these. I've got the 56,59, several 62 and two 64s. Thanks for looking!


Pillar of the Community
Canada
4723 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  5:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Will to post this one. I think I will start to send to NGC from now LOL. I will like to have 66 on the coins
Pillar of the Community
United States
2312 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  6:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Willburton to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks sil. You are right about 66. It is very hard to get that out of PCGS.
Pillar of the Community
United States
8871 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  6:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Earle42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That 1964 is a Type B REV - it has a premium over a type A REV
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash?
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halves
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4723 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  6:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes Earl it is, I do not mention because I will start to be again nervous. All those Type B from 1956 till 1964 are really underprices. We see a common cent variety in thousands and thousands with prices 10x that those varieties all under 2000 pcs in this case and others under 500.

Will, not only the PCGS also ANACS do not give easy an 66 to the business strike. I can show here many examples of all the series, and almost perfect ones come back 65. Before was "Long life to the king" today it is "Long life to eBay, Etsy speculators?!!!LOL" All this I think is because we analyze the coins not by the period produced but by global. The most stupid thing I can concept myself. How you want an 1880 coin, an 1964 coin to be same with the modern era strike after 2000? Only idiots and stupids unliterated could look at those coins as same.
Edited by silviosi
03/16/2023 6:56 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  7:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mrwhatisit to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice one

I have three of them currently, the 2nd rarest the 1962 I found at a flea market last year in a small baggie of 3 silver quarters for 5 dollars each, the 1963 in a dealers junk box of quarters, and the 1964 amongst my own collection unknown until I looked!
There was a very good article written about these several years ago by a Richard Appel on August 10th, 2018 for coinweek.com
Pillar of the Community
United States
2312 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  8:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Willburton to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the comments guys and sil the last three anacs coins I broke out and sent to PCGS all went up a grade. I now look for anacs coins that command a much higher premium in one grade higher.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4723 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  8:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I just send an 1956 better then my 65. If come better you can have my 65
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4723 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  8:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@ mrwhatisit

Here it is the TOP of the TYPE B quarters as per First of March 2023: I do not have the data from ICG.
I want to mention that only one Die was use for each of the years.

1. 1956 381
2. 1962 525
3. 1961 611
4. 1964 673
5. 1957 979
6. 1963 1458
7. 1958 1513
8. 1960 1786
9. 1959 1958

Hope help you and ALL.
Edited by silviosi
03/16/2023 9:05 pm
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
United States
15501 Posts
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4723 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2023  11:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No Dear, on the period 1956 and 1964, the Mint in Phil at the end of the production they use Dies from Proof strikes. So you will have a normal Observe Die and an Reverse Proof Die. This kind of reverse Die you find in RDV-002 and RDV-008. To see them is the easier thing on quarters: The Leaf near the Arrows tips is Higher.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
5166 Posts
 Posted 03/17/2023  12:23 am  Show Profile   Check tropicalbats's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add tropicalbats to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't know much about grading quarters, but I picked this 1947-S/S FS-501 in Baltimore today and while the holder is NGC MS66, the coin just looks like a 64 with a lot of nicks and scuffs on it. This is just a quick phone pic as I'm too whooped to do anything else right now, but lots of surface trouble would probably be more visible with a better image.


Pillar of the Community
Canada
4723 Posts
 Posted 03/17/2023  01:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
And me for this I had 64

Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
9759 Posts
 Posted 03/17/2023  05:08 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have no idea how the OP coin grades MS66 - it looks corroded to my eye.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Too many hobbies .... too much work .... not enough time.
Pillar of the Community
United States
2312 Posts
 Posted 03/17/2023  06:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Willburton to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is a different standard in grading. From my experience the NGC "old soap box"holders can go up a grade when submitted to PCGS, with the exception of Lincoln's. most Lincoln's I've seen in an old NGC holder have a dark red tone almost brown. I blame the material in the holders.
  Previous TopicReplies: 14 / Views: 278Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.





Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2023 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. Powered By: