| Author |
Replies: 71 / Views: 6,156 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
note the 2 is not filled on the VW plate3 photo's, but Alans book posts them, VW does post your date and Cracks.. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
The filled numbers are no longer PUPs IMO
Edited by remmy1100 08/26/2010 1:49 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
yes, the filled 2 were on many dies for 02, I don't believe they are direct PUP'S, but do help, one still has to use date and MM and reverse types to narrow them down..
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
The problem with the filled 2's is that there are VAMs that have been noted to have a filled number only to have examples of the same VAM that do not have it. This should only "at best" be a secondary diagnostic. If you are trying to attribute 1902-O VAMs from the VAMworld site and it is not an obvious coin, its almost a waste of time. Most other series I would not agree with that, but the 02-O series has to be the most difficult to attribute. This is one series that without the guide, most will be lost. (again not counting the obvious coins)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
709 Posts |
There is only one 1902-O VAM known (at this time)that has pitting around D in dollar. That VAM is VAM 18.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
I wish I had my 02-O guide at work... LOL I agree that the only pitted D known in the 02-O is the VAM-18... That said, before I comment more, I need to check the guide. I am confused by the MM being tilted left and the date being within Normal. I will cross reference the guide (unless you already are Oz) and reply later.
Edited by remmy1100 08/26/2010 3:53 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
In my opinion, one aspect of this site which makes it stand out, head and shoulders above the others, is the willingness of you guys to jump in and help a newbie out like you have. I recall at some other locations, a cry for help from a new person might be met with aloofness, or a demeanor of unwillingness due to the belief that their knowledge had come at great cost, and worth more than just the appreciation of the inquirer.
It ain't over yet prlahr, one of these guys will come up with the correct answer, I can just feel it.
By the way, I recall asking Alan when he announced that he was deep into researching the '02-O, just why did he pick this particular date/mm to zero in on...("were all of the interesting dates already taken?") I expected such obvious jest to be returned in kind, but the response was serious and I thought that this was rather out of character for such a dry wit. Now a book ensues, I should have suspected this, but am surprised nonetheless.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
Hear Hear! All of us VAM neophytes and wannabes agree!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
709 Posts |
There are a couple of things to note: Vamming is a continual work in progress. John Roberts ( a VAM attributor) put it nicely when he said, "think of it as moving pieces on a chessboard. I'd go even further and say it compares to assembling a jigsaw puzzle without the boxtop as a guide. We have only a fuzzy idea of what 'the big picture' really is until most of the pieces are in their proper place."
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
I think that this is the sort of thread that Gene could really sink his teeth into. Too bad....(He must be pretending that his computer isn't working again).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
I believe there is no doubt this coin is VAM 32, 1) I do believe we can all agree that the date placement is normal.. also note these pictures are yours just blown up showing 2 specific things A the cracks at the neck to the date and specifically the gouge under the first left star of the date  this is a excerpt from the book of the first left star gouges found on some coins.  2) also not that your earlier photo clearly shows it to be c4/c3 2nd olive reverse VAM 18 and VAM 18A are c4 single olive reverse coins..here is your photo of the mint mark.. set right lilted left  Note the D...is not pitted the pitting is NOT raised as VAM 18A is...here is the plate of VAM 18A VAM world plates to not show all of these things but the book does... Vam32
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
709 Posts |
Please take pictures of the first left star on the obverse. If VAM 32 you should have gouges under the first left star.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts |
You know Gene, I wasn't going to get into the pitting thing, but I never really did buy what looks to me as a depression ( PMD) on the coin, to be a pit in the coin. Only the OP could verify if it is raised or not, but I do see a difference in the pitting on your photo of 18A, and the lack of it on the OP's coin. Yeah, the area around the star is the same. You say that the crack is also identical? Are there more pup photos from the book that the OP could use to compare to his/her coin? We are not doing anything wrong by posting these pictures from the book are we? At this point, all I see that is 32ish is the star. Does the 32 share this obverse with any other varieties? Can you nail down the reverse also?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
I agree. This IS NOT VAM-18. The date is in fact is in the wrong position. I am looking at the guide right now. The MM, and date do appear to be a VAM-32. Good call Gene! Although you will notice that the picture in the book does show the filled 2, but the caption only says date placement and die crack. Nothing about the filled 2. VAM-32 is within normal date position also.
Edited by remmy1100 08/26/2010 10:03 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
Yess there are a few more pointers for VAM 32,, the doubled ear I believe is shown in his picture, just not well enough do to the angle of the picture trying to shoot thru a loupe.. there is a specific die file line on the upper most arrow head, about the middle of the arrow head..The filled 2, is known on many that year for being later die states, the one posted on VAM World is an EDS.. also there are very minor rim Cuds that from his pictures can not be seen...though he should be able to see them with his loupe.. also doubled eagles nostril and eye...
|
| |
Replies: 71 / Views: 6,156 |