Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

10c 1940 Repunched Date Versus Date Doubling

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 2,931Next Topic  
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10463 Posts
 Posted 03/11/2012  1:02 pm Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This is probably the most extreme example I have seen. Unlike other date doubling from 1940 10c coins I have seen, this date either was hub-doubled or repunched. This example is more extreme than those Hans Zoell documented.

Zoell originally called this 261F in 1961, with a die crack through 10 CENTS. Then, he decided to call this coin part of the north offset of progressive date doubling and catalogued it as R262e in 1965. This is where Zoell classifications can get messy, because this coin is more like the 261F example, with die cracks, than the progessive Die Deterioration Doubling of R262e...

Anyhow, this is a tough coin to find, this recently found example is VF-30.

10c-1940-Repunched-Date-Versus-Date-Doubling

10c-1940-Repunched-Date-Versus-Date-Doubling
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Rest in Peace
wert's Avatar
1988 Posts
 Posted 03/11/2012  1:52 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
SPP...I have never seen a coin doubled and offset that much as your coin is....Did you find it in your pocket change...?

Very, very nice find.

Edited by wert
03/11/2012 1:53 pm
Valued Member
Canada
456 Posts
 Posted 03/11/2012  2:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pginrh to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Is there any other evidence of doubling on the sails or elsewhere on the reverse?... I can't really see from the date that this is purely hub doubling as there appears to be doubling in different directions on the date digits.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
9870 Posts
 Posted 03/11/2012  5:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DBM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Can you post a pic of the whole reverse please?
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10463 Posts
 Posted 03/11/2012  10:33 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
PG, the 10 CENTS is doubled, but not as much. The rest of the reverse devices are not doubled, I wonder if this is a repunched date (the RCM also did some wonky things with the date on the NFLD 1c and 10c coins struck in 1940 as well...). This is certainly not MDD, because the denticles adjacent to the date are pristine and not doubled at all.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Edited by SPP-Ottawa
03/11/2012 10:34 pm
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
9870 Posts
 Posted 03/12/2012  02:37 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DBM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think the incompleteness of the numerals on your coin adds to the dramatic effect,other coins have similar offset.Not MDD,not likely a repunched date to extend die life like the newfoundland coins.
Valued Member
Canada
456 Posts
 Posted 03/12/2012  10:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pginrh to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It appears to me that there are some aspects of tilted hub doubling as the date is the main subject of doubling... it also appears that the working hub rotated when leaving the working die because it looks like directly below the 4 and 9 that the metal has been pushed up. Not too sure about the repunch aspect as the last punch is usually clean and the doubling appears around that clean image.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
9870 Posts
 Posted 03/13/2012  02:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DBM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Some speculation
It's 1940,first year of the war,the demand for coins is such that the mint must produce more than double the coins of any previous year.Some skilled mint workers have gone to war and skilled manufacturing workers are hard to come by with the country gearing up for wartime production.The pressure to produce is on at the mint.One or more dies is first sunk with a hub on which the date has deteriorated,then with a different hub.
Valued Member
Canada
115 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2012  3:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Terry-T to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Almost as much offset on mine. No other doubling. Faint die clash of sail in front of king's face.

10c-1940-Repunched-Date-Versus-Date-Doubling
Valued Member
Canada
456 Posts
 Posted 03/14/2012  7:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pginrh to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The Terry-T coin was struck earlier in the life of the working die ... it looks like SPP's coin was struck later and the 9 and 4 digit details are starting to deteriorate with usage.... a puzzling point though, the doubled image of the 9 seems to be moving down if you look inside the closed loop of the 9.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2301 Posts
 Posted 03/15/2012  9:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsguy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice examples of Die Deterioration Doubling(the life of). Remember the mint kept pushing dies to the limit in this era.
Valued Member
Canada
456 Posts
 Posted 03/18/2012  11:39 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pginrh to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I picked up the following at yesterday's coin show in Cambridge.

10c-1940-Repunched-Date-Versus-Date-Doubling

Forgive the picture quality as all I have is a scanner. It is an earlier die state of SPP's coin (complete with die cracks through the 10 cents). Looking at the images, Terry-T's coin, although similar, looks like it has been struck from a different die. If you look at the doubled image inside the 9, it is offset to the right on the SPP coin and to the left on the Terry-T coin.... It was fun looking into the 10-cent area (rather then the 50ct which I normally look at) although you need a good/younger set of eyes for the smaller details.
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 2,931Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums