| Author |
Replies: 54 / Views: 5,491 |
|
Pillar of the Community
527 Posts |
http://www.dispatch.com/content/sto...n-house.htmlQuote: WASHINGTON -- Rep. Steve Stivers says the United States will save dollars if it makes pennies and nickels with steel instead of copper, zinc and nickel.
A bill that Stivers introduced last year would ensure that pennies and nickels are made of steel, although pennies would be dipped in copper. Yesterday, the measure received a hearing in a House subcommittee.
Stivers, R-Upper Arlington, said that according to the U.S. Mint, the cost to create a penny is 2.41 cents, and the cost to create a nickel is 11.18 cents. He said that by changing the composition of nickels, dimes and quarters, the United States would save as much as $207 million a year.
John Blake of the Cummins Allison Corp., which develops solutions to sort and authenticate currency, checks and coins, said that if Congress moves forward, it should consider whether the change would increase the risk of counterfeiting.
Blake said, however, that the low value of pennies and nickels makes it less likely that people would counterfeit steel versions of those coins. Nevertheless, he urged the subcommittee to be cautious before supporting a change in the coins. *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
67 Posts |
they just keep demonitizing money.
what next? wooden nickels?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
If the pennies and nickels cost so much to produce, why produce them?
Same applies to the one dollar note.
With those two coins gone, a smaller size half could be included in the circulating coinage system, along with the existing dollar coins.
The pennies and nickels could still be included in Mint collector series, if there is a demand.
Just imagine: a pure nickel Nickel! Hmmmmm. The Canadians tried that once upon a time!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
410 Posts |
Both the penny and the nickel should be eliminated. However, if we are going to waste money minting them we might as well waste less money.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
NO!
Switching to steel will save virtually no money whatsoever in the production of pennies because the switch to steel will require a tremendous increase in the number of dies needed.
The cost of the penny ultimately has almost no bearing on the material of which it's made anyway because the costy of the penny is having to count and handle something so worthless that there is no material which has such low a value. The cost of the penny is in the waste of using it and transporting it to landfills.
Steel weighs a lot more trhan zinc meaning shipments will cost substantially more. Instead of a few semi loads every day there will be a few more. It's more wear and tear on the roads that serves no purpose.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
Instead of taking your bottle of coins to the bank every six months to get cash you'll have to take them every five months. This means more tellers and more hernias.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
Quote: Steel weighs a lot more trhan zinc meaning shipments will cost substantially more. Instead of a few semi loads every day there will be a few more. It's more wear and tear on the roads that serves no purpose. Interesting concept. But I find when people who desperately want the dollar coin to be used exclusively (by the government eliminating the dollar bill), tend to dismiss this concept if not totally deny there is a problem with it when applied to the issue of the dollar coin. In another thread I finally just polled the Canadians. They gave me links to their own news broadcasts from years gone by, that said, indeed, a weight problem is a real issue they were forced to swallow. I legitimately wonder if the government savings would outpace the added expense consumers/the private sector would be stuck with b/c of increased shipping charges for the metal coins vs paper? This was brught home to me in a more real manner the other day when I picked up a box of a thousand Rutherford B Hayes dollars at the bank. Actually I was thinking it was a box (my first) of JFKs since this is what I ordered). When I hefted it to put into my bag, and then was walking it to the car, I was saying to myself that it was no wonder some banks charge extra to order these! When I got them home to start roll searching and saw that the teller had mistakenly given me a box of dollar coins, it got me to thinking just how much more it would cost to ship these as opposed to paper. I know I am sure glad not to be in a position (like some venders would be) where I would be forced to carry 5 or more boxes of these at a time - they ARE heavy! Yes, I am for the government not spending tax payer money - but I have to wonder if the savings are worth the inconvenience? Granted I personally would not really be affected by only using coins (too much) since I do not plan on getting more boxes of these. But having that many of the coins actually in hand - experiencing them for myself - really brought to life how businesses would be affected by cost of handling the much heavier metal coins. Maybe the taxpayer savings, overall, would actually cover the cost  But somehow I also think that the taxpayers would never see any of that savings go back in their own pockets anyway. So in the long run, it would just be more expensive, but only in the private sector of people who deal with large amounts of these, to use them.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2295 Posts |
It makes no sense to mint cents anymore, since the Canadians are stopping the cent and they were already minting cents with steel and a copper coating and they were losing money.
It just shows the US politicians have no idea what is going on in the world and are totally ignorant.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2295 Posts |
Quote: When I got them home to start roll searching and saw that the teller had mistakenly given me a box of dollar coins, it got me to thinking just how much more it would cost to ship these as opposed to paper. I've heard this argument before and it doesn't make sense. A quarter weighs 5.7 grams and a dollar coin weighs 8.1 grams with a difference of 2.4 grams (less than a tenth of an ounce). And there are about 28 grams in an ounce. The money is transported in armored cars, which are much heavier than you can imagine, so the extra weight shouldn't matter. It is no different than them transporting thousands of quarters or thousands of dollar coins. Yeah, a dollar coin weighs much more than a dollar note, but still, the savings of not having to print almost 900 million notes each year and get rid of or destroy the shredded notes, to replace the worn ones, is a huge savings. Canada and many other countries have been doing this for decades. If it was done at a bigger loss, they wouldn't be doing it.
Edited by wquinn 04/19/2012 4:07 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
208 Posts |
Quote: Both the penny and the nickel should be eliminated. Umm..how do you eliminate the nickel and not the quarter?  Perhaps you are referring to eliminating the nickel in nickels? If you eliminate the nickel you would need to eliminate everything that contains a denomination smaller than $.10, and since a quarter contains $.20 and $.05 you have a problem.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2295 Posts |
Quote: Umm..how do you eliminate the nickel and not the quarter? Perhaps you are referring to eliminating the nickel in nickels? If you eliminate the nickel you would need to eliminate everything that contains a denomination smaller than $.10, and since a quarter contains $.20 and $.05 you have a problem. I think he was talking about the 5 cent piece (AKA nickel), which has been talked about being eliminated in other threads, since it costs over 11 cents to make. And just by eliminating the cent or 5 cent piece, has nothing to do with individual pricing. It is about the final sale and it only affects cash transactions. It would be more complex in rounding and I don't think the average person could ever understand it.  I could see the US Mint replacing the copper in the nickel (5 cent piece) with steel, since Canada is doing that now and I think they are making it without a loss.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Quote: If the pennies and nickels cost so much to produce, why produce them?  Our Congress has beaten this subject to death--while ignoring the obvious. The penny at least has outlived its usefulness.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: A bill that Stivers introduced last year would ensure that pennies and nickels are made of steel,....
He (Stivers) said that by changing the composition of nickels, dimes and quarters, the United States would save as much as $207 million a year. I'm confused. Does this bill make the cents and nickels out of steel, or does it make all the coins out of steel? If it just does the cents and nickels it's a waste of time because it will barely make the nickels profitable at current rates, and they will still lose money on the cents. Quote: Steel weighs a lot more than zinc meaning shipments will cost substantially more. Steel weigh less than 10% more than zinc. On the other hand, if the bill makes all the coins out of steel, steel weighs 14% LESS than coppernickel which means shipments with weigh substantially LESS. Quote: The cost of the penny ultimately has almost no bearing on the material of which it's made anyway Correct, because the cost of production right now, not including the materials, is already Two Cents apiece. So even if the material cost NOTHING you would still lose one cent apiece for every one you make. Quote: And just by eliminating the cent or 5 cent piece, has nothing to do with individual pricing. True but if you get rid of the cent and the nickel and leave the dime rounding to ten cents they will be times where you need to return 15 cents in change and without cents or nickels that becomes more difficult. The buyer will need to give you another dime and get a quarter back. What if he doesn't have the dime? He can give then a quarter and get four dimes back. And vending machines probably can't handle this so all prices will have to be in quarter increments.
Edited by Conder101 04/19/2012 6:00 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
208 Posts |
Quote: True but if you get rid of the cent and the nickel and leave the dime rounding to ten cents they will be times where you need to return 15 cents in change and without cents or nickels that becomes more difficult. Yep, that's what I'm saying. You buy something that is $4.85 and you give the cashier a $5.00 bill, how does the cashier give you change back without using a nickel or pennies? The bottom line is you will pay for it one way or another. Lets say the government starts making pennies & nickels out of steel, and let's make a HUGE, wrong, assumption that the government would pass that savings back to the taxpayer. Now all companies will have to install new vending, soda, & coin machines that take the new nickels (and pennies in the case of coin counting machines). New machines means more cost to companies, which they in turn will pass on to the consumer. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
I dont think making change would be as big of a deal as one might think at first. They could either leave current coins in circulation for a few years or prices would just change. In fact that could leave current coins for a while to give time for pice adjustments. Cash transactions are declining anyway and it wouldnt affect credit cards.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
The current coins would not be demonetized, but they would still disappear from circulation very quickly forcing price adjustments
|
| |
Replies: 54 / Views: 5,491 |