| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,733 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
230 Posts |
Poll Question
So I decided to buy a binder along with 20-pocket BCW pages for storing my 350+ world coins, and I am now in a dilemma of how to order them. I was initially thinking alphabetically by country, but then the idea of sorting them by year and "flipping through history" sounded more interesting. Anyway, I was curious what you all think? Now the only issue is moving everything when I buy new coins.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
507 Posts |
I sort by rough geographic region.
In my mind, it makes sense for Australia to be grouped near New Zealand and Papua New Guinea rather than next to Austria or Argentina.
Then I go roughly chronologically from the olden times to the present.
-wheatiefan
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2605 Posts |
For a world coin collection I think alphabetically. I've tried to do it by geographic proximity but ran into a problem of organizing two-dimensional map into a single file. Say for Europe, start West, Iceland, British Isles, and so on, move East, but then Greece will end up being next to Scandinavia, and all your geographical reasons fly out of the window.
So I finally did them alphabetically within different continents.
By year it would make sense if it was some kind of a themed collection, but even then you may run into problems. For example I put my Elizabeths chronologically, certainly within different effigies. But then some (Commonwealth) countries decided to have a young queen on their coins into 21st century, while others have more accurate age appropriate images.
By value or metal content? ... If that is of importance to you.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
I collect World coins all cultures, from the invention of coinage up to about 1950.
Those coins struck before about 1800 are assembled by date, but after that time, by country, then date. Machine made coins after about 1800 are far more numerous the those before 1800, and so demand a different approach as to how the collection is assembled.
For ancients, the collection is subdivided by culture, then approximate date. That is: Greek, Roman, Byzantine, Islamic, Chinese, Indian and South East Asian.
I do not subdivide the collection by metal, because that would take them out of context with other coins of the same period. Having said that, a select few of my more valuable coins are stored separately in a safe.
Generally, the published catalogues should give you some direction as to how your own collection is arranged.
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16826 Posts |
It does depend on your primary "theme" or "interest" in world coins. If you're mainly interested in the geography or you're an OFEC collector (one from every country), then an alphabetic sort is more convenient. If it's history you're really interested in or you're trying to assemble your own one-from-each-year set, then a chronological sort is more suitable for you. I'm interested in both, but geography is more important to me than history, and I'm also aiming for OFEC. So it's a purely alphabetic sort for me. I'd suggest avoiding "sort by value", unless the extra-valuable ones are indeed going somewhere more secure. Why make it easy for the thieves to find all your most valuable coins at once?  Quote: Now the only issue is moving everything when I buy new coins. My "default" layout is to put two empty pockets between each country. Since I rarely buy a whole bunch of coins from the same country all at once, this usually is sufficient to prevent a major repositioning. If, after a while, there are several album pages with no empty pockets left between countries, I'll insert new pages there as needed and spread the crowded pages out into the empty ones.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Thailand
1509 Posts |
That's the beauty of this hobby/obsession. It's entirely up to you. Take my car collection, Alpha-Romeos, Bugattis, Ferraris etc. [I'm only kidding}. I go with Sap and others and have them sorted alphabetically and listed on an excel spreadsheet. The listing allows me to easily see exactly what I have (down to mints and years) and a location where I can quickly locate the country and the denomination and have the coin in hand in under a minute. I mean you could (in a perverted way) have them in size, weight, composition order if YOU want.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2661 Posts |
Alphabetically by country, it is the easiest way to find them later.  This coming from a guy with about 3000 world coins in 2x2 flips stuffed in zip-lock bags with a desi-pak. Well anyway, that is how I plan to do it.............Some day.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2781 Posts |
alphabetically (first letter only), then by age or series, followed by denomination.
i left lots of room between countries but had to do a major reshuffle when I bought 10 lbs of bulk. just bought another 30 lbs so probably have to add a binder and reshuffle again! hopefully I am getting close to being done with most of the common stuff and the collection will grow a little slower (ya right)
i just bought some BCW pages (box of 100), personally I think they suck. they were the lowest price at the time but I wish now I spent a few dollars more, waited and got my regular brand (ultra-pro) but my regular dealer was out of stock. the BCWs had at least one or more pockets still sealed shut (had to be opened with an exacto knife) and the welds tear very easily. they are also VERY loose around the flip. turning a page without museum type handling procedures will have flips jumping out all over the place. tipping the binder on its side (or god forbid upside down) and you will be one step closer to re-organizing your ENTIRE collection.
BCW = cheapest (i think I paid 25 cents each / 100 box but I would not buy again at any price) Ultra_Pro = $6 / 10, much better for everyday / average use
also common are several brands with heavy plastic, very strong 3 hole edge (dark blue), around $1 each, absolute bullet proof and nothing ever falls out (these I save for my canadian collection and more expensive world coins).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
1063 Posts |
Yeah, I do it geographically. I have a European album, and African album, and Americas album, and Asian and Australasia album.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
614 Posts |
Well WHEN my 2x2 coins were in the binder they were in alphabetical order. Then the binder broke...
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
230 Posts |
Well, I'm glad I decided to do a poll since there is a clear consensus of sorting alphabetically. I'm hesitant to do it by continent, borders can be vague (i.e. where would Turkey go?) and I have a lot more coins from some continents than others. Plus Krause does not bother with sorting by regions. I am surprised that chronologically by year only got 1 vote, I thought it would do much better. I was always interested in history, my eventual goal is to have OFEC and one for every year (since 1700 or at least 1800). Ambitious I know, but every coin gets me one step closer.  And I agree that the BCW pages look cheap but I don't really mind considering the price, fingers crossed that the holders won't fall out. Down the road, I will look for better ones.
|
|
Valued Member
Finland
294 Posts |
I have binders for Europe (3pcs), Africa and Asia (large one) and one for Americas and Australasia (slim one). Countries like Turkey and Cyprus I have checked from Wikipedia or CIA World Factbook. Both are Asian countries geographically and that's fine for me. Inside binders countries are usually in alphabetical order, but I have saved some space and countries like Ceylon and Sri Lanka or Malaya and Malaysia are in same section. But then Soviet Union and Russia are separated as Italy and Roman Empire too. And finally in country section coins are placed in denomination and chronological order. Different coinages like French franc and French euros are both below "France".
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2874 Posts |
I started out with binders for my world coin collection - and it was fine for the first few hundred coins. After that it starts to get tricky. Even if you move on to more and more binders and on to a page per "country" for ease of moving them around it still gets fiddly and cumbersome once the numbers get up.
Currently I use 3 main methods of coin storage.
A cabinet for the best silver and best large ancients - it holds about 1400 coins but is only about half full.
Lindner trays for smaller ancients and some small silver.
2x2 envelopes (not flips with staples) for most of the rest (about 7,000+ coins). I house these in either old cassette suitcases (remember cassettes?) - I have 6 of these and most stuff is arranged alphabeticially in them, or in specially made cardboard coin boxes (for the 2x2's) that fit neatly into those box binders with the spring removed. The latter has most of my Indian and Chinese coins which because of their volumn I keep as separate entities rather than put them in along with the other countrys.
This arrangement suits me very well - and actually changing from the old binders to the 2x2's was great fun as it reintroduced me to some coins I had completely forgotten about and it gave me a chance to photograph everything.
So while I'm really happy with my set up now - I'm still glad I went the learning experience of binders first.
happy collecting.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,733 |
|