| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,431 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1164 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
Are you sure? Looks like someone ran a flat-edged screwdriver across this coin- post-mint damage?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
3039 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1164 Posts |
I swear I can see a fold in whatever made the mark. And you can see some devices under the mark. I think PMD would not show this. I could be wrong. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
808 Posts |
Is lamenation a problem with these nickles? Don't know anything about these coins. Just guessing.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
It looks like a struck-through to me, or mayyybe a lamination. The details would not be preserved through damage that extensive.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5832 Posts |
Could be a combination of both, certain details are there, but the lower part toward neck and date looks to be lamination peel.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2224 Posts |
Lamination is my guess. Too bad none of it is retained. Laminations are very common on all nickels due to the metal mix.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
 my first thought was lamination as well |
|
Moderator
 United States
15469 Posts |
I'm thinking nice struck-through ... but wondering why you chose to start another post on the same coin?  https://goccf.com/t/127074David |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1164 Posts |
I wanted a better pic once I got it home. Just easier I guess!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
163 Posts |
Not a lamination. Struck through extra planchet material. Material folded before strike. Not retained. Nice coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1164 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,431 |
|
Posted 08/22/2012 5:11 pm
