| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,255 |
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Any white marks, are strictly on the holder. Oh, I kinda know what will happen with this coin once opinions come in.   swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15471 Posts |
Lovely coin indeed ... tremendous eye appeal.
The hits on the obverse portrait are a bummer ..
PCGS MS65RD.
David
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
Hmm, let me fix the reverse pic.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7075 Posts |
 Waiting for the fixed photo....because I'm seeing stuff on the reverse...hmmmmmm...
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
I don't know what's going on. I edited in Photobucket, keeps coming up sideways.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
Ah, there it is.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19964 Posts |
66RD.....65 on a grumpy day.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4227 Posts |
 MS66RD
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
64 Red. Middle die state obverse.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
173 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2651 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1745 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
Yeah, I purchased as this:  I also have since graded this coin 66RD once I had it in hand thus, the reason I'm going to return it. He has a 30 day return policy. I've already contacted him. What bothered me was the hit right above the 9 @ 3 O'clock and the abrasions right of ONE. Thanks.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19964 Posts |
I dunno man, you have to remember that the TPG's grade MOSTLY on luster at 66 and up. They will forgive a few minor ticks as long as the eye appeal and luster are there. NGC killed me with a 66 grade on my 39D. I really, really thought I'd get a 67 or I wouldn't have sent it in. In terms of hits, it's there but it didn't have that really bright luster they require for a 67 I guess. 
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,255 |