@mdpmedia
Thanks for posting to remind people not to clean coins that are actually worth something. I forgot some people not familiar with the golden rule of "DON"T CLEAN COINS!" might read this and make a mistake.
I mentioned, on purpose, I knew it was only a .50 coin so I did not mind treating the coin, but I
should have been a lot more specific.
@mcshilling:
Quote:
Now with it in hand if you did not know it was, shell we say cleaned, can you see that you have used MS70
There is no way this piece could ever again pass for a good proof since the surface is scratched, hence the small white lines remaining in the "After" pic. This is why I chose this piece to experiment.
However, after seeing the results on the proof, I was curious as to a normal clad half. I experimented on one of many nicer looking, still-decent-luster 71-P halves I found in a roll (a lot of these out there). I have to admit the 71 came looking very close to a brand new NIFC when side by side. I am not sure I could tell if it had been treated. All the chemical did was seem to remove the dirt. But I still would not use this to treat anything of value.
I admit I suspected NaOH or some other strong base as the primary ingredient since it leaves your skin (accidental - small amount!) feeling slippery like bases do. But I cannot find an ingredients list anywhere.
The bottle says to apply the liquid (I poured it on carefully) , let it sit just a second, and then rub (however, I rolled) a Q-tip lightly over the surface of the coins. This was enough to remove the unwanted stuff (except scratches

of course).
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash?
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly
TPG ineptitude and No FG
Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
Edited by Earle42
01/15/2013 10:41 pm