Let me try to put this grading issue in better perspective.
In 1982 I pounded the pavement and drove city to city looking for a nice '82-P & D quarters. I struck out on the Denver issues but was very lucky on the much tougher Philly coin. I laid my hands on a bag of some of the nicest coins I'd seen in years even though quality was far lower in '82 especially for the Philly coin.
Coins used to come 4000 to a bag and usually these bags were composed 90% of only eight to ten different die pair. The coins from one press were combined with the output of several others on a conveyor belt that carried them to the counters for bagging. This bag had all nice die runs except for one of the runs. The nicest run was a well aligned die pair near the beginning of its life. The earliest specimen was about the 300th strike from the pair and the latest was about 20,000. Some of these were damaged on the conveyor, counting operations, or handling in or after the mint but this bag was relatively pristine so many exhibited little marking.
The odds that someone got a nicer bag by pure chance is low. Remember only about 80,000 coins were set aside so this represents only 20 bags (no, I didn't save all of these but only a small percentage). If you got a bag at random there is a poor chance of having even a single nice coin in the bag because dies struck half a million coins and some dies started life misaligned.
Here's the bottom line. There was one coin from the bag from the best die pair that stood head and shoulders nicer than any other coin. It was not only the earliest strike but it had thankfully not picked up any marking. This coin is most probably unimprovable for the date and I've scoured dealer stock, mint sets, and rolls since trying. I'd grade this coins only a very pleasing MS-64+. It's clean enough to grade much higher. There are probably no more than five or ten that were struck earlier in the die's life. But it simply doesn't match the quality of a mint set Gem because mint set coins were struck under higher pressure and more slowly. It's the best strike I've ever seen on any '82-P but the top of LIBERTY isn't quite full.
So, just don't expect that nice coins from '82/ 3 are going to have the blazing luster and sharp strikes that you find in mint sets. If there had been millions of collectors in 1982 to intercept most of the Gems before they got into circulation then these would be much easier to find today. But this isn't the way things were in 1983. In those days people not only didn't collect clad but the handful who did were not concerned much with quality.
Morgan dollars had just gotten a premium for being choice and no one thought 1983 quarters would ever have a premium in nice condition. But everyone knew there were
no mint sets so many people set aside a roll or two if they saw one. These rolls simply tend to closely match the quality that went into circulation and the quality that went into circulation (especially the '82-P) was simply attrocious.
This is what we have today; attrocious coins for these dates. The nicest coins tend to show up in the
Numismatic News mint sets and those made by Paul and Judy's coins (Arcola, IL). Souvenir mint set coins tend to be quite decent and MS-63 but Gems are very rare in them.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
Edited by cladking
01/27/2013 12:33 pm