| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,382 |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
I agree about the dime, they bore me to death at this point. Luckily theyre my least favorite denomination and they come in the mint sets and just go into the album every year.
Its a fair point about the Franklin being started later, when I consider classification I only concern myself with the end date though. Its hard to make an argument for something being a classic as a whole if its still being made which is why I go off of dates more than the design itself. Even if the Lincoln hadnt been changed at all I would consider those early 1900/pre WWII dates to be classics.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
My opinion for what it is worth.... classic ends for each denomination that was designed in the 18th century. Cents end with IHC's, Nickels with Liberty's....etcetera. Moderns were designed 20th century...Post Modern 21st century....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1109 Posts |
I just have a hard time considering a 1909 Lincoln Wheat cent "modern." Can't really wrap my head around a 104 year-old coin being called modern. I mean, that cent came out before my grandparents were born, and they are both dead now, after decently long lives.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
477 Posts |
Of course in an act of blatant stupidity I asked this question without paying any attention to the thread description written below the titles clearly stating which coin fits in which class. I must pay more attention.
Rick
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189325 Posts |
Quote: Its hard to make an argument for something being a classic as a whole if its still being made which is why I go off of dates more than the design itself. I can understand this.  Quote:classic ends for each denomination that was designed in the 18th century. Cents end with IHC's, Nickels with Liberty's....etcetera. Moderns were designed 20th century...Post Modern 21st century.... I can understand this as well.  Quote:I just have a hard time considering a 1909 Lincoln Wheat cent "modern." Can't really wrap my head around a 104 year-old coin being called modern. It is not so difficult after looking at ancient or even medieval coins. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1109 Posts |
Quote:Quote: I just have a hard time considering a 1909 Lincoln Wheat cent "modern." Can't really wrap my head around a 104 year-old coin being called modern. It is not so difficult after looking at ancient or even medieval coins. Well, I was speaking relatively.  I think it is interesting to see how many varying opinions there are on such a simple question. Guess it goes to show how differently everyone sees the hobby.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189325 Posts |
Quote: Well, I was speaking relatively. I know. I was just being silly.  Quote: Guess it goes to show how differently everyone sees the hobby. Very true. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2805 Posts |
At least Canadian coins are easy: every denomination was designed in 1937 (although the half has seen certain revisions), and the loonie and toonie are modern. The only hitch is the silver/nickel dollar series: I guess 1935-1967 is "classic" and 1968-1986 is "modern".
Before that, every denomination featured a nice wreath.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
For my part, I feel that the "modern" coin era began when the first steam coin press replaced human power at the US Mint, in 1836! 
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 2,382 |