Those of you who know me know that I sell a lot of restored
Buffalo nickels on
ebay. I just got an email from
ebay telling me that they had de-listed a 1919-D nickel that I sold to a guy last night because it violated their replica coin policy.
Aside from the fact that it doesn't make much sense to remove a listing after the item has been sold (I'm guessing they have a Time Machine...?) it honked me off that they even brought it up.
5 or 6 years ago they de-listed a bunch of my coins because describing them as "restored" was not adequate, in their judgment. They insisted that I use one of their "approved" descriptions for the coins. They offered me 4. The one I found the least offensive, and which I have used faithfully ever since, was "chemically altered".
Now, according to the
ebay representative I talked with, a "chemically altered" coin is synonymous with a replica coin. I tried to explain to him that if he would do a search on "restored
Buffalo nickel" he would find hundreds of sellers and thousands of listing that needed to get this violation notification if this premise were true.
So, let me ask you to put your feelings for restored
Buffalo nickels aside and just comment on this: Replica coin violation, yes or no?