| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 3,258 |
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
I'll post what PCGS graded it at in a day or so. Thanks for looking.   Edited by OLCoins
12/22/2013 5:26 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
VF25
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
I think ICCS would grade it VF.
I'd say PCGS has an XF on that one (I sure hope I'm wrong for PCGS's sake).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4227 Posts |
VF20 (very likely higher in a PCGS slab)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I'll go higher and say VF-30.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9866 Posts |
VF20 by Canadian standards
Could go as high as EF in a PCGS slab.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
I'll say PCGS graded it, EF-40
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5404 Posts |
VF 20 in an ICCS holder V35 in a PCGS holder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
VF20 PCGS OR ICCS these days. I know you gents like to harp on the fact that ICCS always grades lower but I would say that in recent history (2/3 years) that has not been the case (on the most part with some net grading being the exception). I've cross graded 6 coins from US TPGs to ICCS, all different coins, at different grade levels, ALL come back at par. Also, I recently submitted 4 x 1964 mint wrapped PL Dollars from an original mint box (shipped from RCM in 1964) to NGC and ICCS. All 8 coins came back PL65 (4 ICCS, 4 NGC). So where I agree that in some cases there has been disparity, it would be unfair to say that it exists with any consistency today. |
|
Pillar of the Community
1844 Posts |
PCGS EF 45 ICCS VF 20 maybe 30 ?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
397 Posts |
 Most of y'all had it pretty much nailed. And thanks for the info. It is good to know more clearly about the differences in Canadian grading and American grading. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5404 Posts |
The only one who nailed it TYVM
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9866 Posts |
Right on Pacificoin,and another nail in the coffin for TheCoinHunter's theory.While NGC and PCGS are getting much better at reliably grading uncirculated Canadian coins,they continue to suck at grading in the F-AU ranges,getting it wrong at least 75% of the time and misleading unsuspecting collectors into situaions where they will part with too much money for a given coin.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Moderator
Canada
10463 Posts |
I would have graded this one VF-30 myself. The NFLD Edward VII strikes are notoriously weak, and anyone who has ever held a mint state coin from this series in their hands, would understand. The only fully struck 20-cent coin from 1904H that I have ever seen, is the one formerly from the Point Grey collection (PCGS MS-67). http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/25..._800x600.jpg"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
Edited by SPP-Ottawa
12/22/2013 11:56 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9866 Posts |
SPP,I think your vision is obscured by smoke from the toaster ;) Here's a once reasonably well struck VF30 http://www.ebay.com/itm/1904-1904H-...em5d305c6a1bAnd a weakly struck VF30 http://www.ebay.com/itm/1904H-Newfo...em1e73f02663Neither of these coins exhibit as much wear as the OP's VF35 As for the PCGS MS67 in your link,the regalia,inner collar and eye area appear to suffer from typical Edwardian weakness.You'll reply it looks better in hand,but an MS67 professionally photographed should exhibit a superior strike. "Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
Edited by DBM
12/23/2013 01:13 am
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,258 |
Posted 12/21/2013 10:11 pm
