| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 20,871 |
|
|
New Member
United States
10 Posts |
Is a 1974 or 1975 dime with no mint mark really worth anything *** Staff edit: split these posts to its own topic ***
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
369 Posts |
Nah, there were 470,248,000 and 585,673,900 of them made, respectively. Just another dime :)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
FYI - a Philadelphia mint mark {P) was first added to a Susan B Anthony dollar in 1979, and were added to the other coins in 1980. exceptions: War Nickels from Philadelphia had a large P on the reverse, and Cents made in Philadelphia have no mint mark.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1234 Posts |
I've always found it funny that the Philly mint is so inconsistent and lets face it, Lazy, this year yes that year no, this coin yes that coin no... Then there are the years they gave up on it, 1965, '66,'67 had no mint marks for any mint. Was it really just laziness  , or did the mint think silver would come back and those years were not important due to lack of silver? (40% on the JFK's of course) The elusive 1982 no mint mark dime is something to keep an eye out for, again laziness, someone forgot to set the die up right.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
ASLAN, in 1965-67, the San Francisco Mint was preparing to make proof sets, so they stopped circulation examples. I don't know what happened to Denver though
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1903 Posts |
In the 60s no mint mark years there were large coin shortages in circulation from people hoarding the older silver coins. To minimize the impact of people collecting coins via mint mark, they just deleted the mint marks from all mints so there was just one coin to collect thereby keeping more new coins in circulation.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
IMO ... The 1975 no mint mark dime, that everyone would like to find is th 1975 no "S" proof dime. There are two known.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Philly inconsistant? For 149 years they didn't put a mintmark on any of the coins then from 1946 to 1978, 32 years they didn't put their mintmark on any of the coins. Since they started putting mintmarks on the five cent through doppas they have only missed it on one dime in 1982. Seems pretty consistant to me.
As for the lack of mintmarks 1965 - 1967, that was due to a severe coin shortage in the early 60's. They blamed coin collecters for it and said it was because they were hoarding large quantities of coins.. The governments logic was that if they left the mintmarks off collectors would be discouraged and hoard fewer because they wouldn't be hoarding each different mint. One of the real reasons for the shortage was because the silver coins were worth more than their face value for the metal and everyone was hoarding them. But they blamed coin collectors and they actually introduced legislation to make it illegal to collect coins or to sell a coin for more than it's face value
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
Oh my gosh, I'm so sorry! 
Edited by CoinCollector2000 01/30/2014 11:07 pm
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 20,871 |
|