| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,685 |
|
|
New Member
United States
17 Posts |
always fun to find one like this.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1572 Posts |
Nice die chip: Fun to find, fairly common error for the fifties especially. I still keep them even though there is no premium. Good eye and happy hunting!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2651 Posts |
yeah...I keep all wheats...mostly for copper...but also because they are fewer and far between..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1944 Posts |
fun find.
i also keep nearly all copper cents. I have a seperate storage container for the oddities - chips, cracks, laminations, some MD (if it is extreme - or unique, etc.
always to find something with some interesteng characteristics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1745 Posts |
Nice, definitely a keeper. It only costs a cent to throw it in a jar.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Note the 8 on the date. You can see that it shows the extreme die wear on that digit. The field and the top of the device are almost the same height on the right hand side.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
901 Posts |
A chipper date with S/S! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Which is heavier? 1. A coin with a Cud on it? 2. A coins with die chips on it? 3. A coin with a mint mark? 4. A coin without a mint mark?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
450 Posts |
I would guess they all weigh the same. Is metal actually added in any of those cases?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Correct. The planchets should all weigh the same if they are pre 1981 or post 1983. The 1982 is the exception year with the copper/zincs used. Planchets can vary in weight slightly. But the striking cuds/mint marks/lack of mint marks/chips will have nothing to do with adding weight. If a piece of a die was inbedded into the coin, then it would weigh more. (I can't sneak anything by you guys. LOL)
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,685 |
|