| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 4,026 |
|
Valued Member
Italy
216 Posts |
Does a 1895 S far date exist or this is just an indicator of a fake 1895 S ?
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Korea, Republic Of
1881 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Italy
216 Posts |
[URL="http://postimage.org/]  [/url] [URL="http://postimage.org/]  [/url] |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
There's no mention of a far date position on VAMworld and it sure looks like a fake to me.
|
|
Valued Member
Italy
216 Posts |
.....also to me looks fake
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36844 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
The only thing that sold it a fake for me was the 9 in the date, anything else that raises red flags? The denticles look pretty well struck
|
|
Valued Member
United States
199 Posts |
The 9 digit looks way off.
I was going to suggest it came from an 85S. However, the only 85s with far date is VAM-5 and the mintmark doesn't match this coin.
So it could be from 85p with added mintmark too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
That severely tilted "9" definitely is a red flag. The first "S" in "STATES" doesn't look quite right, either. Hve you weighed this coin and/or checked its specific gravity so as to determine if it's an altered coin or a total forgery? Of course, in either case it's a loser.
Colligo ergo sum
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
The 9 in the date is conclusive, and sufficient. Fake or faked.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1551 Posts |
Without question this is a Fake or a date job where the 9 is made. I would check 1885 p VAM's to see where a match would fall. It could be an added mint mark and (9) Edited by twohawks
06/26/2014 5:08 pm
|
|
Valued Member
440 Posts |
Falling over "9". If you are gonna produce a fake will you at least make an effort to make it appear plausible.
|
|
Valued Member
Italy
216 Posts |
....and what you think about this other 1895 S....is this fake too? [URL="http://postimage.org/]  [/url] [URL="http://postimg.org/image/alcrc6mub/full/]  [/url] |
|
Valued Member
United States
199 Posts |
Hmmm... this new one is pretty tough. But my gut instinct telling me that this one is also fake. First, there is no VAM listing for 95s with high mintmark. And second, the date position doesn't match to any listed 95s. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
I'd say the second one's also a phony simply on the basis of how much more the obverse appears to be worn (low XF) than the reverse (high AU or even BU).
Colligo ergo sum
Edited by Lucky Cuss
06/27/2014 3:17 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
May I ask (in general terms) what the source of these was? There in Italy, online, or ?
Colligo ergo sum
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 4,026 |
Posted 06/26/2014 09:30 am
