I think lots of people collect/keep/maintain albums, of dimes.
The series is just so... how to put it nicely? Boring? Uninspired?
I have a Dansco that I am filling with high end dimes, unc and proof.
"Filling" is a good word. It's pretty mechanical with this series,
compared to the love and thought I put into more exciting sets, such
as my
Jefferson nickels or 32-98 quarters. Almost every other set is
more interesting and exciting to work on compared to the FDRs... IMO,
the post 98 quarters and the "golden dollars" are the only other series
that are equal to, or even more boring than the FDR dimes.
You won't find a truly nice 49s for $2.50. There are a few (very few, but
more than one for sure) years that you won't find TRULY nice examples of
for only $2.50, now that I think about it. You can probably find coins of
these years that fall into the definition of 'uncirculated', and technically
give you an unc set... However, it won't be a set to be proud of. When I
build a modern set, especially one as easy as the FDRs, I can't see why
you would want to cut corners and have a mediocre set. I think I paid $15
for my 49-s, but without either dumb luck or an unknowledgeable seller, your
$2.50 coin, even if unc, will look like crap next to my $15 coin. Is a little
pride in your set worth saving $12.50 in the 'big picture'? IMO, a modern set
that MOST of the coins will cost pocket change, spending a McDonalds lunch
to get the best 2 or 3 "harder" dates is just not worth fighting.
(and anyone that knows me, knows I am a really big cheapskate)
This is just my opinion... Yours may vary.