| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,813 |
|
|
Valued Member
Italy
220 Posts |
a dear friend I moved this coin of 1792, in my opinion is not authentic, according to you? 
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
large cents weren't produced until 1793, so it must be fake or an altered date
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
807 Posts |
This is a "Liberty Parent of Science & Industry" pattern of 1792, which is the correct date, or else a fake of one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
This is a very bad copy of a Birch Cent. The Birch Cent was a pattern produced in 1792 by Robert Birch. Only a handful were ever made. There is no way that this is authentic in my opinion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4415 Posts |
Edited by ExoGuy 05/13/2015 09:04 am
|
|
Valued Member
 Italy
220 Posts |
In fact, as I had imagined it is a pair of a rare coin thanks for the answers Simone
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1211 Posts |
Fuzzy: That is really irresponsible of you to give people bad advice if you do not know what you are talking about.
Did you even look at the picture?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4078 Posts |
Fuzzy stated, Quote: large cents weren't produced until 1793, That is correct. This one is a pattern coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
1849 Posts |
Interesting. Not a terribly bad copy, or whatever it is. Per RedBook only 9 patterns are known of the cent Without a Silver Center of the 1792 proposed coinage, of which this appears to be a copy. By comparing to images of known examples, there are differences in engraving and style, but wouldn't it be great if this was real?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16677 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: Fuzzy: That is really irresponsible of you to give people bad advice if you do not know what you are talking about.
Did you even look at the picture? Obviously he looked at the pic, because he answered correctly. What's your excuse?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4078 Posts |
Quote: What's your excuse? How about, open mouth and insert foot. Been there done that.  @ jerseyben
Edited by bpoc1 05/13/2015 5:19 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
589 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Italy
220 Posts |
It looks much like the currency of Goldberg but are not sure it is real
|
|
Valued Member
 Italy
220 Posts |
if it can be of help the weight is 4-4.5 grams and a diameter of 22 mm the edge is knurled
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1211 Posts |
You guys are kidding right? He did not answer correctly.
"large cents weren't produced until 1793, so it must be fake or an altered date"
So just because it is dated earlier than 1793, it MUST BE A FAKE... THIS IS NOT AN ACCURATE STATEMENT.
If you look at the pic, you can see that it is a copy of a 1792 pattern cent.
My problem is the "if, then statement". Yes, it is a copy but it is not a "fake large cent" just because it is dated 1792.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,813 |
|