| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 3,039 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
586 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
586 Posts |
Some of the pics I took were sub par, I thought, so I decided to add a pic of the dime w/o my flash going off and attempt a pic on the nickel with more light. Not professional by any means but it's the thought that counts right? Haha  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
Seems like we have questions about 1964 SMS come up, every so often. I read a couple articles to see if I could get some more information. One stated that 1964 SMS coins are extremely rare. PCGS has graded (2008) 22 cents 18 nickels 22 dimes 28 half dollars The article also state that when mint director Eva Adams passed on, most if not all the known set were in her estate. I would think it hard to tell the difference between a well struck good luster coin and a SMS. If I had them right next to each other, I like to think I could. I also would wonder, what type of holder the 1964 the SMS came in. To me I don't think would be the same as the regular mint sets. And if I had coins I thought might be SMS, I would do research to see which mint would have made them. My guess would be just the Philidelphia mint. And they might have been packaged like the 1965 set. If it helps the op here is a picture of one I found online 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
586 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
586 Posts |
Oh last thing. I don't want it to seem like I am talking just to talk but I wanted to point out some areas of possible interest on the Denver Half. If you look at the I in Liberty, look and see if you notice a bottom left serif. Only proofs will have one which is good to know. On the Reverse the SMS dies used a non proof die I believe. The broken rays are hard to see with the chaos my flash created but you should be able to make out a straight G in the initials, which is not fitting for the obverse die but is fitting for the die combo on the SMS coins. Again, not saying I'm right I just wanted to explain my thought process
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
586 Posts |
Haha my pleasure! It's a nice series to check on and I also enjoyed reading about the history of numismatics during that time. The good and the controversial lol! I will say 65-67 sms coins are relatively cheap and a good way to get familiar with the unique characteristics. There are apparently some with a cameo effect but I have yet to see one in person
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
You seem to have done some good research on these coins.
I just gave Breen a quick check, but did not have much or any information for 1964 SMS.
It would be nice to find one of these sets.
Maybe if you get to one of the larger coin shows, you could show the coins to the PCGS or NGC table, see if they could give you some information .. before submitting a coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
586 Posts |
Sure I'll be in Long Beach June 4,5,and 6th checking out the Expo so if they will be there I'll swing by!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
let us know how it turns out
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: I also would wonder, what type of holder the 1964 the SMS came in. They did't. Although some people talk about 1964 SMS coins they were apparently special test striking and they were just loose coins. They were never put together into any kind of an official "set". There are a few "sets" today but they were assembled from individual coins, a put together "set". The problem is they are refered to a SMS "Special Mint Set" coins when a better term would be Specimen coins.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
I had to look up what sms was. Seems very confusing
Hflirn, I believe pcgs OWNS the long Beach show so yes they will be there
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
586 Posts |
I could see how that might be the case. I've heard mixed reviews on the condition of the 64 SMS coinage. From flawless to possible production or specimen coinage with bag marks. I think the theory of them being in sets probably came from people who took into fact that there were flawless or near flawless coins known. Of course that doesn't mean it is so, in my opinion. I do believe that they were specimen coins and some would say have slightly different characteristics than the SMS coins of the years that followed.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 3,039 |
|