Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1964 Set

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 3,039Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Hflirn's Avatar
United States
586 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2015  08:48 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Hflirn to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I gathered these, over a few days, and would like an opinion on whether they are from a mint set, business strikes, or, due to the sharp rims, an sms coin. The nickel I separated and put along side another well struck 64' for comparison. I've been trying to hunt and buy 64's that I thought might have a running chance of being an SMS for a looooooong time so any feedback, whether good or bad, would be much appreciated. The penny doesn't seem to have as much of a typical proof edge as I would expect from other sms coins. There is a line that goes along the rim starting at U on United which looked familiar to some 64 SMS lincoln pics I looked at so I thought I'd include it.

1964-Set

1964-Set

1964-Set

1964-Set

1964-Set

1964-Set

1964-Set

1964-Set

1964-Set
Pillar of the Community
Hflirn's Avatar
United States
586 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2015  12:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hflirn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Some of the pics I took were sub par, I thought, so I decided to add a pic of the dime w/o my flash going off and attempt a pic on the nickel with more light. Not professional by any means but it's the thought that counts right? Haha

1964-Set

1964-Set
Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2015  1:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Seems like we have questions about 1964 SMS come up, every so often.

I read a couple articles to see if I could get some more information.

One stated that 1964 SMS coins are extremely rare.
PCGS has graded (2008)
22 cents
18 nickels
22 dimes
28 half dollars

The article also state that when mint director Eva Adams passed on,
most if not all the known set were in her estate.

I would think it hard to tell the difference between a well struck good luster
coin and a SMS. If I had them right next to each other, I like to think I could.

I also would wonder, what type of holder the 1964 the SMS came in.
To me I don't think would be the same as the regular mint sets.
And if I had coins I thought might be SMS, I would do research to see
which mint would have made them. My guess would be just the Philidelphia
mint. And they might have been packaged like the 1965 set.

If it helps the op here is a picture of one I found online


1964-Set
Pillar of the Community
Hflirn's Avatar
United States
586 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2015  2:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hflirn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hey thanks for the pic! I feel there isn't a lot known about the SMS sets. I heard once that they were sold in plain plastic set holders. I am not sure if this is true. It appears that the sets were broken down and sold individually afterwards at some point. The 64 SMS Half Dollar seems to be the only coin that I feel is more coin hunter friendly, due to the fact that there are some possible die markers to look for. Still a gigantic task to hunt and actually find one lol! Sometimes, I make up ridiculous theories on what went on in 64'. For instance, The San Francisco Mint made the SMS coins in San Francisco starting in 65. However, I may have heard that they used the facilities in Denver for proof(like) coinage a few months before 1965. Now I am not an expert so take everything I say as a grain of salt but I believed that if San Francisco was using the Denver Mint during this trivial time what would the odds of some coins with similar SMS characteristics from Denver getting out be? I thought this coin met some of the die characteristics I believed were on the 64 SMS. However, I have been wrong before and this theory is what people would refer to as a Hail Mary lol! I definitely don't want to confuse people so please understand that I am merely throwing a wrench in the gears for amusement, thought, and debate

1964-Set

1964-Set

1964-Set

1964-Set
Pillar of the Community
Hflirn's Avatar
United States
586 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2015  3:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hflirn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Oh last thing. I don't want it to seem like I am talking just to talk but I wanted to point out some areas of possible interest on the Denver Half. If you look at the I in Liberty, look and see if you notice a bottom left serif. Only proofs will have one which is good to know. On the Reverse the SMS dies used a non proof die I believe. The broken rays are hard to see with the chaos my flash created but you should be able to make out a straight G in the initials, which is not fitting for the obverse die but is fitting for the die combo on the SMS coins. Again, not saying I'm right I just wanted to explain my thought process
Pillar of the Community
edweather's Avatar
United States
7375 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2015  4:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add edweather to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, now you've gotten me interested in 1964 SMSs. Just what I need, one more thing to obsess about
Pillar of the Community
Hflirn's Avatar
United States
586 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2015  4:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hflirn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Haha my pleasure! It's a nice series to check on and I also enjoyed reading about the history of numismatics during that time. The good and the controversial lol! I will say 65-67 sms coins are relatively cheap and a good way to get familiar with the unique characteristics. There are apparently some with a cameo effect but I have yet to see one in person
Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2015  10:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You seem to have done some good research on these coins.

I just gave Breen a quick check, but did not have much
or any information for 1964 SMS.

It would be nice to find one of these sets.

Maybe if you get to one of the larger coin shows, you
could show the coins to the PCGS or NGC table, see if
they could give you some information .. before submitting
a coin.
Pillar of the Community
Hflirn's Avatar
United States
586 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2015  11:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hflirn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sure I'll be in Long Beach June 4,5,and 6th checking out the Expo so if they will be there I'll swing by!
Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2015  12:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
let us know how it turns out
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2015  09:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I also would wonder, what type of holder the 1964 the SMS came in.

They did't. Although some people talk about 1964 SMS coins they were apparently special test striking and they were just loose coins. They were never put together into any kind of an official "set". There are a few "sets" today but they were assembled from individual coins, a put together "set". The problem is they are refered to a SMS "Special Mint Set" coins when a better term would be Specimen coins.
Pillar of the Community
Cascade's Avatar
United States
7390 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2015  10:36 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Cascade to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I had to look up what sms was. Seems very confusing

Hflirn, I believe pcgs OWNS the long Beach show so yes they will be there
Pillar of the Community
Hflirn's Avatar
United States
586 Posts
 Posted 05/23/2015  10:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Hflirn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I could see how that might be the case. I've heard mixed reviews on the condition of the 64 SMS coinage. From flawless to possible production or specimen coinage with bag marks. I think the theory of them being in sets probably came from people who took into fact that there were flawless or near flawless coins known. Of course that doesn't mean it is so, in my opinion. I do believe that they were specimen coins and some would say have slightly different characteristics than the SMS coins of the years that followed.
  Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 3,039Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums