| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,037 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6387 Posts |
Here's another coin that is extremely expensive in high grade but becomes almost reasonable when worn. How would you grade it? Do you think it would qualify as problem-free?  
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Reverse is better than obverse, but I would say VF25 overall. Nice coin,
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7621 Posts |
Fine to very fine. Should slab in a problem-free holder, too.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
I'd call it VF-20 (just shy of 25). I have a hard time justifying gold coins with this many surface issues as problem-free. Yes, gold is a soft metal and yes the coin likely got all of that from circulation and not from tampering, but I have seen many gold coins with good surfaces, even in worn condition. A TPG would give this a problem-free grade. I would too, as long as I wasn't buying it for myself.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36780 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
VF20 obv, VF-25 rev.
Net VF-25?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It might make it into a problem-free holder even with its cleaning which to me is the issue here unless it's been tooled above the hair/coronet. If the obverse carried the grade it's an F15.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
711 Posts |
Loving your Half Eagles Jaobler.
Keep them coming.
I'll go with the consensus VF 20, but with a few margaritas in me she is looking mighty fine.
Maybe instead of VF20 very fine, I'd go with MF25, mighty fine.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,037 |
|