Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

New Error? 1967 Lincoln Cent With A Mint Mark?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 2,973Next Topic  
New Member

United States
4 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  04:13 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add LetsGoOs to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Would love to get you guys option on this coin any chance at all or just wishful thinking and tricky eyes?

New-Error?-1967-Lincoln-Cent-With-A-Mint-Mark?


New-Error?-1967-Lincoln-Cent-With-A-Mint-Mark?



New-Error?-1967-Lincoln-Cent-With-A-Mint-Mark?

*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***



New-Error?-1967-Lincoln-Cent-With-A-Mint-Mark?
Edited by LetsGoOs
08/18/2015 10:21 am
Pillar of the Community
mdpmedia's Avatar
United States
3546 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  05:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mdpmedia to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
LetsGoOs

W/o having a more focused and larger close-up of the mm it appears that this alleged mm is nothing more than the results of someone lightly tapping on a nail using a hammer.
Pillar of the Community
Biedercoins's Avatar
United States
1601 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  06:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Biedercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Is there anything on the corresponding spot on the reverse?
New Member
United States
4 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  07:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add LetsGoOs to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I believe the coresponding spot on the Rev would be around the middle or bottom rung of the E in America there are some spots on the M but it doesn't look like it's anywhere close to the MM location
New Member
United States
4 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  07:13 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add LetsGoOs to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
These are as good of pictures as I can take on my phone but I do have a microscope with a digital camera if needed
Rest in Peace
T-BOP's Avatar
United States
18456 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  09:04 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add T-BOP to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes it looks like ( but can't be ) a MM.; Pic of date area very weak.
Bedrock of the Community
Earle42's Avatar
United States
10038 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  09:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Earle42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting looking coin. I am looking forward to seeing our expert's opinions on this.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash?
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halves
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
Pillar of the Community
Rackster's Avatar
United States
4809 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  11:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rackster to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nail theory sounds good to me. Sharper images would allow folks to be more definitive. Good luck.
Pillar of the Community
westernsky's Avatar
United States
7618 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  11:12 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add westernsky to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wished it was a real mintmark. THAT would be earth shattering. But....

1). The "mint mark" is positioned too high.
2). The "mint mark" shape is not in line with the known "D" used on 1964 or 1968 coins.. It looks more like a stubby "o".
3). If a die had actually been punched with a mint mark and used, more likely than not more coins would have been manufactured and others would have shown up within months of being released. Not some 50 years after the fact.

My conclusion is post mint damage enhanced by circulation wear. As always, I'm open to other opinions.

New Member
United States
4 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  11:13 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add LetsGoOs to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can take some with the microscope but I thought these came out pretty clear enough to at least see that there are no indentations on the reverse side anywhere near the raised bump on obverse so if it's from a nail they did it without denting the reverse side or they patched it I'll dig out the ms cope and take closer pictures and see what u think
Pillar of the Community
Pete2226's Avatar
United States
3330 Posts
 Posted 08/18/2015  11:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Pete2226 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If it had been hit with a nail or something like that, I would expect to see a pressure ridge very much like what I can make out on this coin. A clear, close up photo would be most helpful!
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 2,973Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums