| Author |
 Replies: 33 / Views: 4,050 |
|
Valued Member
United States
281 Posts |
looks like a high grade Red to me..thoughts?   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll go 65RD; cheek hits seem minimal.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
More than likely 65RD.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
yeah , I'll go MS-65RD. nice IHC |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
716 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
I'll go with 65 but I strongly suspect it would be RB.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
281 Posts |
Should be here tuesday, I'll be able to provide better photos, when I bought it I was thinking 65ish. Why you say RB? I'm just curious as I mostly collect Morgan's so copper is new to me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
Wow beautiful coin!
MS-65 RD!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18687 Posts |
Strong strike. This is a problem free MS65 coin. Hard to tell for sure but looks RD
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1132 Posts |
Quote:
l go with 65 but I strongly suspect it would be RB. I'm inclined to agree. The color strikes me as digitally "optimized". |
|
Valued Member
United States
281 Posts |
seller has 135k reviews. last 12 months 24k, 30 neutral, 11 negative. I read all the neutrals " refund took forever, coins looks better in photos than in hand( bought a Fine at best Seated quarter that looked rough) stuff like that. the negative were the same, "long shipping time, seller altered lighting to sell ( it was a 3-coin lot of dirty brown indian heads) I mean if they knew what they were looking at I cant imagine they could leave those feedbacks. its right in the photos! there was one that was legit, a Seated half dollar listed as BU with *weak strike* but it was dipped or cleaned at the very least and had slight wear. the thing is you could see it in the photos, why bid on something you can plainly see has wear, then be mad and leave a negative when it looks exactly like the picture? sure it shouldn't of been listed as BU but the photos are top notch you can see it isn't BU. anyway sorry about my rant its just ignorance annoys me to no end. I would imagine seller probably brightened the image at most, I doubt hes done anything colorwise or altered the photos other than standard brightness and contrast. which I kind of expect from one of the biggest ebay auction companys you know? super clean, bright photos that show all the details and don't hide anything. Edited by kdrcoinzz
09/05/2015 10:46 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1132 Posts |
Quote:
super clean, bright photos that show all the details and don't hide anything. Except for the color. Take this 1904 for example. Neither of these photographs have been altered in any way whatsoever. The first photo was taken indoors (on the leg of the jeans I happened to be wearing at the time) using artificial light. Look @ example A. Can you tell if the coin is Red or RB? A)  Example B. The exact same coin, taken outdoors using only the Sun. B)  Edited by CopperCastle
09/05/2015 11:34 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 33 / Views: 4,050 |
Posted 09/05/2015 5:59 pm
