| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,404 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2403 Posts |
This is my 3rd actual graded Morgan. Need it for my Dansco, but can not bring my self to break open PCGS slabs. The faint scratch you see on her face is on coin not holder.   Does this lighting and new set-up make it easier to grade my coins? As usual any and all opinions welcome. Thanks...Mont.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
PCGS? MS-61/2
Id say MS-63. Nice coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Good shot at 64, but fingerprints detract.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
set her free fill the dansco you can always send it in for a new holder, no?
MS63 although its tough to tell the luster in these pics. nice coin though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2403 Posts |
Quote: although its tough to tell the luster in these pics. nice coin though. Coin has great luster, adjusted WB (using auto adjust) in editing to show flaws and try to get rid of slab defects. You can still see a little bit of the cartwheel from the luster on the sides especially on reverse. Same pictures...just lightened.   These are more accurate to what coin looks like. Still doesn't show full luster. Sorry guys and gals I'm still playing with new set-up and software. 1st slabbed coin to go through it.
Edited by MontCollector 05/31/2016 6:33 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm at MS64 if the cheek is as good as it appears in your photos.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
PCGS said MS64. The toning is take it or leave it.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5675 Posts |
Looks like MS-64. The photos have great detail, but the luster isn't showing well. Maybe less light diffusion and more directional lighting?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
I agree, break it out and put it in your album. once you have done that once it wont be as big a deal. I had the same thoughts when I wanted to crack my first one out. it belongs with the rest of your coins. someone mishandled this one a lot. there a fingerprints everywhere. maybe an acetone bath will help. good luck on your breakout.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Breast seems to have some wear so first thought is AU-58 but I suspect they let that slide and gave this one a 63 (or 64 ... just saw grade was already posted!)
Edited by fenton 06/01/2016 9:03 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2403 Posts |
Quote: (or 64 ... just saw grade was already posted!)  I didn't post grade yet. Gonna post it later this evening or early tomorrow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2403 Posts |
I won this one on the bay. Cost $45.65/ free shipping I think the sellers very poor pictures (not from a coin dealer/collector) held it back. I trusted the PCGS slab to be at least what it was reading as, and as always I verified serial number before bidding. Ok so here it is.  I do believe it is a strong MS63 as I have seen much worse coins get this grade now a days. Wouldn't be too surprised if it did make MS64 if resubmitted though. Edit: Any Vammers out there looking at this, could you please tell me if the is a normal O or high O. To me it looks high and to the right, but not tilted. There however is not a 1900 O with mm position high and right(Not tilted) listed. I do know this is a near date, just need MM position to determine VAM.
Edited by MontCollector 06/02/2016 02:34 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Seems like a reasonable market grade. I think they were on the fence about AU-58 v/ MS-63 and decided to give it the benefit of the doubt and net it out at 62.
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,404 |