| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,500 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
534 Posts |
It's the D/D RPM #1 Variety...   Thanks
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Possibly, but wouldn't be surprised to see a 58 either.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
441 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18665 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19951 Posts |
Can't see any indication of cartwheel luster, obverse fields look broken. Close call, because this issue is not very good. The reverse looks like it may have been "worked on" with something acidic....or it's just the pictures....looks dull. The obverse looks great, nice color.
AU-58
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Better than AU IMO, MS-62BN
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
I would lean towards MS-62BN.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36745 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
534 Posts |
Thanks for everyone's opinion! I personally think it is better than AU, but I'm not good at grading. There is some splotchy/cloudy toning on the reverse but it still has pretty good luster..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
666 Posts |
On the reverse, the right-side wheat stalk seems to show signs of wear. If that is the case, AU-58. If what looks like wear is actually an artifact of the lighting, focus, angle, etc., then MS-62BN.
Edited by dd27 07/31/2016 10:49 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3516 Posts |
 I see just a slight amount of wear at the highest points. But if you get lucky it might slip a 62 or 63
Edited by Dustin6 08/03/2016 9:17 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
73 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
534 Posts |
Coin came back from NGC graded MS62 BN. Looks like a lot of you guys were right on 
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,500 |