| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,525 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Edited by TypeCoin971793 08/02/2016 08:02 am
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
The surfaces seem too shiny. I wouldn't be surprised if it's been "reprocessed".
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6370 Posts |
Trust me. They are fully original and lustrous. They aren't "shiny."
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36744 Posts |
I think the spotting will hold it to no more than MS-64
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19948 Posts |
Looks original to me, 64+.
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
Yeah, looks original to me too.
MS-64, nice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
932 Posts |
Wow! For $4? that's a steel! 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4078 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Very close to 65 nice coin.. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
I am the one who does not like carbon and rust spots. MS63 to me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Bothers me as well, 64 tops. But I think it's original.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
314 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
I think the reverse will keep it no higher than MS 64.
I am with the few .. the obverse does not look quite right
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18662 Posts |
i think the lighting is making look like it was reprocessed. reverse will hold it to MS64
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,525 |
|