| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,180 |
|
Valued Member
United States
308 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
For $28 ... It would be a interesting coin to have.
I would buy it.
Not sure if it would be natural to artificial toning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Very pretty coin I'm at MS-64 for this one. Reverse toning seems natural and rather spectacular.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4471 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2403 Posts |
Looks uncirculated MS63-64 range, but looks dipped and stripped and retoned to me.
So I have to agree with the UNC Details grade.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
308 Posts |
I truly respect all of your opinions here but was wondering why the AT thoughts or is it one of those which just looks too good to be true? I purchased it from someone who does not deal in coins so they would have bought it for the silver content only.
The cartwheel luster on the obverse is spectacular, so it doesn't scream dipped to me.
Thanks!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36903 Posts |
MS-61, far too many marks. Toning looks original in the first two photos, second two the lighting enhances the colors making it look AT.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4471 Posts |
When I looked at the coin, I was trying to figure out how it was toned. The toning is not from mint bags, not typical album toning, not wood grain toning, not envelope toning, not end roll paper toning, so how did the coin get toned? The lip stick red from the photo looks on top of the surface and unnatural.
|
|
CCF Advertiser
United States
1533 Posts |
The fact that it is uniform from fields to devices make be think AT. A naturally toned coin will have different shades as the elevation of the design changes.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree 61, not sure about the toning, though I lean toward AT.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
I'll stick with 64 and naturally toned. The luster is absolutely booming on both sides and it seems the reverse toned over a long period of time which be unusual for AT. Would also be unusual for an AT coin to be darkly toned only on one side.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
MS 62 details / AT - obverse has a LOT of scuffing
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
unc. Details
Looks like AT
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
MS-62. Spotty is usually a bad sign for toning.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,180 |
Posted 08/10/2016 7:56 pm
