Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Question For Thomas On Chinese Coins

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 989Next Topic  
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  6:18 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I've had theses two coins in my collection for a number of years, I've labeled them as from the Qin dynasty. Do I have them IDed correctly and are the genuine?



Question-For-Thomas-On-Chinese-Coins

Question-For-Thomas-On-Chinese-Coins

Question-For-Thomas-On-Chinese-Coins

Question-For-Thomas-On-Chinese-Coins
Pillar of the Community
Kamnaskires's Avatar
United States
7066 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  6:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Kamnaskires to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I could very well be wrong, but I'll be curious to see if number two is from the Western Han Dynasty (Ban/Pan Liang obverse)...
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  7:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just checked my data base the first coin I have labeled as Qin and the second one as Han.
Moderator
Learn More...
Spence's Avatar
United States
34440 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  7:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@bob, looks more like Western Han to me due to the shape of the liang looking like a sideways letter E. I'd go with Hartill 7.17. Ron is it 24 or 25 mm in diameter?
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb

"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  7:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Right around 24mm a little more with the spurs.
Moderator
Learn More...
Spence's Avatar
United States
34440 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  7:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I do see a somewhat similar coin in hartill that has the opposing sprues attached and it is listed under Qin dynasty (hartill 7.5). However, the script style looks different to me and that would be 26+ mm in diameter.

I'm very interested to hear what TC has to say on all this.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb

"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  7:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm trying to remember where I put the box with those coins in it so I can remeasure and give a weight. I didn't have it listed in the data base for some odd reason so I'm going by memory which is getting pretty cloudy these days. If I find it I'll update the information.
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  8:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
OK I found them. The first coin is 25mm x 2.2 grams, and the second coin is 24mm x 2.9 grams.
Pillar of the Community
TypeCoin971793's Avatar
United States
6370 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  8:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TypeCoin971793 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Got Bob's email. Been doing math homework all day.

Both are Western Han. The second one is later than the first one. The first one intrigues me (in a good way; I think it is genuine) because the characters are not regular. I think it is oriented properly, but some strokes seem to be missing. (Look at your other coin to see what I am talking about) There is also a rim, making it more desirable.

Typically, anything over 5-6g and more than 28mm (though mostly more than 30mm) can be attributed to Qin and earlier. Around 180 BC (early Western Han), the weight standard was changed to 8 Zhu (~4g at 0.5g per zhu) and these measue 28-32mm in diameter and weigh 3-5g. [Notice how the weight is more consistent than the diameter. That is how these are attributed; weight, then character style/fabric, then size.] Over the next 40 years or so, the diameters shrank to 22-25mm, and the weight decreased to a 3-4 zhu standard (1.5-2g).

At this point, the coin's stated denomination, "Ban Liang" ("Half Ounce", or 12 zhu, or 6g), did not match the amount of metal in the coins. Han Wu Ti felt that this was very confusing, so he decided to issue a coin that had a denomination equal to its copper weight. He issued a coin called a San ("Three") Zhu, but he made its actual weight a little heavier thinking that it would be popular and thus circulate. These new coins were popular, but they were melted down for their excess copper, thus they did not circulate. Han Wu Ti, seeing the failure in his coinage, ceased production after only two years, making the San Zhu rare today. He then introduced a Wu (five) Zhu to the correct standard (2.5g), and these quickly became the basis of Chinese commerce for the next 700 years.
Pillar of the Community
TypeCoin971793's Avatar
United States
6370 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  8:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TypeCoin971793 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Here is what I mean when I say some stokes are missing on your first coin.

It should be this: "Ban Liang" (read right-left)

Question-For-Thomas-On-Chinese-Coins

I see this: "Gong Liang"

Question-For-Thomas-On-Chinese-Coins

Can you give me in-hand input? Thanks!
Moderator
Learn More...
echizento's Avatar
United States
23731 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  8:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add echizento to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Goes to show how little I know about Chinese coins. Thank folks for the help. Thomas your knowledge about these coins is amazing, thanks for your help. I'm going to update my data base.
Moderator
Learn More...
Spence's Avatar
United States
34440 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2016  10:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Thomas your knowledge about these coins is amazing

"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb

"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 989Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.37 seconds to rattle this change. Forums