| Author |
 Replies: 25 / Views: 3,388 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
BadThad, Wouldn't that possibly damage the coins inside the envelope? Jbedwell,   John1  Edited by John1
03/16/2017 05:24 am
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
421 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
188660 Posts |
You did good. Those are very nice.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
That is a beautiful set. Looking forward to the 64.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2 |
|
Valued Member
United States
421 Posts |
The 1964's will be posted this afternoon
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
I agree ... good pickup for the price |
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
On the first set,the dime with the spot on it will be melt value.The quarter looks like it has milk spots so,melt value.The nickel looks real nice. The second set, dime and quarter and maybe half look like a mild cameo.Nickel and cent look nice also. You have the coins in hand,are any of them cameo? John1 |
|
Valued Member
United States
421 Posts |
The second set is definitely cameo. Those are not milk spots. It's the package sorry for the cruddy pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
The dime and quarter might be candidates for cameos, but we would need close ups of each to confirm. The half is not a cameo.
Regardless, its still a nice set. Wheat cents are super common, but the proofs dont get much attention, so that's kind of cool.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Obv of the dime looks Cameo, obv of the quarter is lightly cameo, but I don't think either reverse is cameo and both sides have to be cameo to get the designation.
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,388 |
First Page
Posted 03/16/2017 12:02 pm
