| Author |
Replies: 32 / Views: 4,616 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4867 Posts |
The title pretty much speaks for itself. The series has remained the same for 71 years. On one hand, maybe it's time for a change. But on the other hand I admire that series because of the regularness of it, meaning not changing designs multiple times like quarters and dollars. The only real changes it's had is the switch from silver to clad and moving the mintmark from the back to the front. I am considering putting together a set.
So having said all that, it has been eligible for a design change for decades now but has not changed. What is the rationale behind that? Have there been any recent efforts? Last I heard was quite some time ago about Reagan?
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
470 Posts |
The Dime is a dog series. It suffers mostly from lack of interest.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2200 Posts |
The first thing that needs to happen is that people need to want to do it. I don't think anyone wants to do it or feels a particular need to do it. How do these changes take place? The last major change was replacing the Franklin half with the Kennedy half. A major tragedy had just taken place and the nation needed to salve its wounds, and this was a fitting way to do so. But ever since we've moved from metaphors to real people on our coinage, politicians have been loathe to change, mainly because these men have become so identified with their representation on our money, it seems that it would be a sin to remove them. For example, who wants to be remembered as the person who took George Washington off the dollar bill? I think that as we move from physical money in our daily lives to electronic commerce, our coins and bills take on less and less importance. We still use them, but we have more pressing things on our minds than thinking about them. Just look at the failure of all the recent dollar coins to take hold in the public's imagination. Non-collectors--of which there are hundreds of millions--just don't care, and neither do their elected representatives. Thus, our coins remain stagnant and will do so for the time being.
Edited by jpsned 06/25/2017 12:55 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7618 Posts |
When coin changes get in the news the foundations of the name-sake organizations get in a frenzie because they think "their" name-sake "owns" that particular denomination. They seem to think that any changes to "their" denomination should ultimately pass through them for their approval. When the Jefferson nickel went through design modifications during the Lewis and Clark bicentennial celebration the Jefferson Memorial Association threw a fit until they were assured that the Monticello themed reverse would return to the coin after the celebration was finished. You can rest assured that the March of Dimes would get "excited" if it was announced that the Roosevelt dime was being phased out in favor of a Reagan Dime to support Alzheimer's research.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4867 Posts |
Personally I would rather see a rendition of Lady Liberty or something symbolic on our coins rather than old presidents. Besides we already have presidents on the paper notes so it's not like they are being snubbed.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188110 Posts |
Quote:The last major change was replacing the Franklin half with the Kennedy half. Say what?  You forget that Eisenhower was replaced with SBA.  Haters gonna hate.  
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
Well JBuck, they did replace one ugly harpy with another after that! 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188110 Posts |
Wow, never knew Sacagawea had detractors. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
I would not be opposed to having Reagan on the dime.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1187 Posts |
I really think they are a sleeper series. Even the key date, mint state and fully struck can be found for a few hundred bucks certified by a TPG. Think about this as well, pretty much everyone in the US has been around while the series has been circulating. That means the coin design is familiar to even kids born today, so the potential for collectors in the future is higher IMO. I think that's why series like the Half Dime aren't as popular. None of us were around when they circulated so the coin doesn't resonate as much as say a Lincoln Cent, Roosevelt dime, or Washington quarter. I don't think the Roosevelt dime series will "wake up" until the design changes though (and who knows when that will be).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
I don't think there is much chance of getting Roosevelt off the dime until all "the greatest generation" that revered him, their parents (almost all gone now), and the first half of the baby boomers, that grew up with tales from their parents about how great he was, have all passed on. That could be another thirty years or so.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188110 Posts |
Quote: I don't think there is much chance of getting Roosevelt off the dime until all "the greatest generation" that revered him, their parents (almost all gone now), and the first half of the baby boomers, that grew up with tales from their parents about how great he was, have all passed on. That could be another thirty years or so. Excellent point and I agree. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
I doubt that our government even thinks about messing with who is on what coin. If they ever do think about changing coins, it will be way to late. I suspect they already know money as we know it today is on it's way out.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188110 Posts |
Which will go first... Roosevelt from the dime or the dime from circulation... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
I would prefer to have the Rossie changed to a non boring looking style or drop it. They could have minted the Mercury dimes til present and I would have had a interest still in dimes. At least they are Cool looking coins.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4867 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 32 / Views: 4,616 |