| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 2,680 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
I picked this Half Dime up a couple weeks ago and wanted to see what the CCF Members had to say about her in comparison to what PCGS graded her as. Thank you for your interest and comments!    |
|
|
|
New Member
United States
23 Posts |
Very pretty/ I would guess AU 50 area depending on actual luster. Little scruffy on reverse but still a solid coin. congrats.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
186 Posts |
AU-58. Neat little repunched date.
EDIT: hey look it rhymes
Edited by Benja
09/08/2017 6:16 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
304 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3474 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote:
AU-58. Neat little repunched date.
FS-302 from the looks of it. If the date included a kitchen sink, it'd be repunched too.  I'm inclined to agree with your grade, although nothing between AU55-MS62 would surprise me with this one. There. How's that for decisiveness? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1660 Posts |
Well struck, MS 60 or better, cool rpd.
Are the scratches above Half and below Dime on the holder or the coin?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6394 Posts |
I don't see any wear. Few marks, just those wispy hairlines in reverse fields. Target toning is very attractive and looks original (or close enough). I'm not seeing luster but I presume it's there, just not apparent in these images.
MS-64 seems very possible.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
MS-64 at least here. Just don't see any wear. Beautiful coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
MS62 Too many little scratches and dings for a 63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Reviewing the pics and especially the reverse scratches, I'll drop to 63.  Edited by Coinfrog
09/08/2017 6:22 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5675 Posts |
Perhaps a minimal rub on the upper leg, otherwise I'd say MS-63. Wonderful toning.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
AU-58 or MS-63. Very well struck. Really on the fence about the grade, I keep thinking there's a slight rub and then think "Nah". Probably has been cleaned at one point but has retoned nicely and now looks market acceptable.  Edited by Omegaraptor
09/08/2017 8:03 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 22 / Views: 2,680 |
Posted 09/08/2017 12:19 pm
