| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,402 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
115 Posts |
Curious as to what you guys think of this on the grade? Thanks in advance and feedback always welcome.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
If it has no surface problems ms63-64 rb reverse looks like it has gunk around the letters?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5588 Posts |
It looks like it has an oily film all over it. Definitely UNC as far as wear, but hard to see because of the reflections from the oil/coating.
Edited by okiecoiner 09/28/2017 7:04 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
MS63 Lacquered..probably BN or if lucky..RB
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1527 Posts |
I'd say MS 62 BN, but it looks as if someone sprayed hairspray on it or lacquered it as DEVLEC suggested above.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
63BN. Agree the luster looks too bright.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
I have a couple on small cents that have been lacquered too so, I would say this one is the same, hard to say with the photos but, looks MS something...lol
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
851 Posts |
MS lacquered. Sexy coin, nice coloring.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1051 Posts |
I like the ICCS blanket designation of "MS-60, lacquered". Basically it's UNC but the surface alteration makes it unnecessary to assign an accurate numerical grade based on the coin surfaces, kind of like "details" on a US TPG slab.
Edited by 1cent 12/07/2017 10:22 am
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
324 Posts |
MS-62 Red and Brown, lacquered. Very nice if you dont mind lacquered coins.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
125 Posts |
A little off topic, but if one was to find a lacquered coin, should one de-lacquer it? Or just leave it be?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5588 Posts |
If it's already lacquered, leave it alone. Once air gets to the surface, it will start oxidizing and losing its "red"
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,402 |
|