Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Is This The Right 1988 LMC Variety? Is The Am And FG Right?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,312Next Topic  
Valued Member
Learn More...
malgal's Avatar
United States
119 Posts
 Posted 02/05/2018  6:49 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add malgal to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
*** Edited by Staff to Add Year / Mintmark / Denomination to Title. Titles are Important! ***

Is-This-The-Right-1988-LMC-Variety?--Is-The-Am-And-FG-Right?
Is-This-The-Right-1988-LMC-Variety?--Is-The-Am-And-FG-Right?
New Member
unpersonsmith's Avatar
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 02/05/2018  6:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add unpersonsmith to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1988 transition has an extended G, normally found on the 89. The 89 transition has a simple G. Normally found on the 88. If that os just camera doubling I would say that is the normal G for the 88
New Member
unpersonsmith's Avatar
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 02/05/2018  7:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add unpersonsmith to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I could be wrong. Need a better pic ;)
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15489 Posts
 Posted 02/05/2018  7:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
From what I can see in your photos ... this is the expected Wide AM variety for a 1988 LMC.

Were you thinking perhaps of the collectable 1998 - 2000 Wide AM ( WAM) circulation strikes?
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Valued Member
Learn More...
malgal's Avatar
United States
119 Posts
 Posted 02/05/2018  7:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add malgal to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Here is the FG on the 1988. The one in the Cherrypickers'
Guide.


Is-This-The-Right-1988-LMC-Variety?--Is-The-Am-And-FG-Right?
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 02/05/2018  8:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like a RDV-005 which is normal the EDV-006 is shorter at the top of the 'G' on FG.
Is-This-The-Right-1988-LMC-Variety?--Is-The-Am-And-FG-Right?
Pillar of the Community
luvmyCAM's Avatar
United States
1479 Posts
 Posted 02/05/2018  10:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add luvmyCAM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Coop here I go again on the 88 P and 88 D RDV006 F'S-901. Bear with me on this question; isn't the other hypotesies on the 88's existence due to the dies being tested late in 1988 and then a concentrated effort made to destroy and not released for circulation of these coins?
The numbers certified by NGC and PCGS are very low for a scarce variety to have had many dies producing these coins. What is it 8 dies for the 88 and 12 dies for the 88D? My gut instinct is there is more to this story.
The information has been out on these for what, 9 years now? Wouldn't a higher population certified by TPG and auction results show a trend upwards with more folks searching for and seeking to buy this variety?
The numbers I have tracked for the last 12 months show a consistent scarcity of this variety in the market and in the posts on CCR.

I have tracked all the ones sold on GC and ebay in 2016-2017 and they show low turnover also. Most of the examples sold show spotting, pitting, and all the signs of a rough brief life in circulation. I gather we will never know the official party line from the mint on who, where, what, when, or why but I certainly would like to know. This little stinker is quite the variety, most love or are indifferent to these except us variety hounds. I intend to acquire all I can afford with the hope their true scarcity will be at some later point recognized more fully. The 88 P I bought in MS 62 RB appears mid die state, the 88D I found last July also appears mid die state. And there I go again " where are all the ones minted, what happened to them?". Would love the gangs take, I know this cat has been skinned and rehashed but I feel information starved on this one.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 02/06/2018  3:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Probably because the value of them is low, people don't have them slabbed. So the low numbers slabbed by the grading companies don't mean much. Probably only the best BU examples would be slabbed. (MS-66 and higher) When you check on some years on PCGS COINFACTS for images, they only have a few examples posted on the common coins. The more valuable the coin is, then they get slabbed. I've never had a coin slabbed. I've bought a few, but I pay nothing extra for a slabbed coin.
I've heard through the years, the RDV-005 dies were wearing out to quick to finish the 1988 year. So they started using the RDV-006 dies to finish the year. The RDV-006 reverses, I've not seen any of these worn down. So they used just a few to finish the run for 1988. I've not heard of any destroying the coins. They were just struck and released. A friend gave me a slabbed example. It is marked:

Quote:

1988 AC AU58
1988 1C
RDV-006 CONECA DIE 003
WTRD-001
AU 58

That pretty much all I've heard through the years.
What the WTRD-001 means, I don't know?
Edited by coop
02/06/2018 3:16 pm
Valued Member
Learn More...
malgal's Avatar
United States
119 Posts
 Posted 02/06/2018  7:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add malgal to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, I see what you are talking about.
New Member
unpersonsmith's Avatar
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 02/07/2018  02:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add unpersonsmith to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ok, I understood most of that and just wanted to clarify my reply to OP. I watched a video (like you said very little info on this)showing the wide g and close g (not to be confused with AM) being different on some 88s and 89s.
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,312Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums