| Author |
Replies: 1,034 / Views: 64,594 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1375 Posts |
Quote: The third matte proof (1990's era) came in a 1997 Botanic Garden set. Gr58,  Nice example of the '97 matte proof Jefferson nickel. This coin usually suffers from the same reverse toning issues as its '94 sibling if it's left in the OGP. Since Gr58 posted pics of his, I'll post a pic of mine as well (but it IS out of order  ...  Once again, I got this on the secondary market 20 years after issue, but it is only lightly toned on the reverse. Not nearly as much toning as my '94 nickel.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Very nice! 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
149 Posts |
@GR58 -thanks for keeping us complete! I'm not sure why this subject was chosen for a commem, though.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
Why I posted the 1994, 1997 Jefferson and the 1998 Kennedy was ... because the mint only issued these coins with a commemorative dollar. If other collectors were interested in buying modern commemoratives it might be good to know the options. Most modern commemorative come in air-tites in a mint box. But there are quite a few special sets that many collectors don't know about. Just trying to be helpful ...... 
Edited by GR58 03/25/2018 6:29 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
GR58 and BadDog - I sincerely appreciate all of the information and specific details you have both offered concerning the modern issues. I've been cutting and pasting that info so if I do decide to break my self imposed limitation on post 64 purchases I will have that information to enjoy.
I for one always like the details.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1375 Posts |
Quote: ... if I do decide to break my self imposed limitation on post 64 purchases I will have that information to enjoy. moxking, If you did this because of the change to clad coins from silver, then the modern $1 and $5 commemoratives are a way (along with the modern silver proof sets) to collect and enjoy moderns while still collecting coins made of precious metals 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7202 Posts |
I chose to not collect clad coin, they just do not interest me. The moderns I do collect are the silver proof sets, Silver Eagles, proof commemorative dollars and as of late the commemorative half eagles. More than plenty to keep my collection continuing.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
1991 D Korea UNC dollar  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1375 Posts |
And the proof version ... 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Maybe someday the line between the North and South will be removed. Here's hoping. I do like design elements on these and thanks for sharing them guys. It's fun to be able to keep the momentum going in this thread. BadDog - the reason that I don't collect post 64 is more than just the circulating silver end. I've collected dozens of different collections in my life time, and one thing I've learned very well is that the average value of the items in a collection are determinate of a sale of that collection and, more importantly, the percentage of retail a buyer or dealer is willing to pay. Dealers have seen messes of 1970's proof sets, rolls of circulated Lincolns, piles of slick Liberty nickels, and the like, dozens or hundreds of times. I don't blame them if they offer 20% of retail because that stuff is almost impossible to move. On the other hand, if the average value is several hundreds of dollars each, they can stand to increase there percentage offer because it is much less work to score nice profits. I collect by date, rather than by series. I find it much more enjoyable to look at all the different coins minted in a single year all together in one place. Although, even there, I do break my own rules with the CSC and ASE. Secondly, this is my last collection. My US coin collection was my first, and now 50+ years later will be my last collection. I've been selling parts of other collections and that money is going directly into my US set. I only have post 1933 Lincolns as type, although I bought more than that simply to fill some date sets. Same with Jefferson nickels and Roosevelt dimes. I only have the key dates in high grade to serve as type examples. I end my Washington set at 1949. Last - I'm enjoying completing goals in US coins that I never thought I'd be able to accomplish. I keep 50-60 coins on my want list at all times, and it is absolutely great to finish single year or other self-made sets I wanted to see in my own hands. I apologize for such a long answer to a short question. This was my first email on my computer this morning and my fingers wanted to dance.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15575 Posts |
Quote: I apologize for such a long answer to a short question. Your contributions have been exemplary moxking ... and no reason at all for any apology. Thank you for what you are bringing to this thread ... valued and treasured indeed. 
Edited by nickelsearcher 03/26/2018 7:09 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Great summary, mox - I'm sure everyone enjoyed it!  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
887 Posts |
I really enjoyed the 'Modern break'. There are some really cool and attractive moderns. I have always been fond of the RFK, and may have to get one each of the RFK and Botanical sets. Thanks for sharing those, GR58! I bought this (raw) because I thought it was pretty cool looking, but at the same time incredibly ugly. It's a very dark milk chocolate color, and looks neat in hand. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7202 Posts |
Mine is really dark too.  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
190135 Posts |
Both are really nice looking, in my opinion. 
|
| |
Replies: 1,034 / Views: 64,594 |