| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,615 |
|
Valued Member
United States
283 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
562 Posts |
1914?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9150 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
1916-D. John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts |
I am seeing 1916 also...I think?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
mcshilling - There is no 1910-D!  Otherwise, I give. |
|
Valued Member
United States
234 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
Looks like a 1916-D. Taking a photo so the area after the "191" appears darker may help.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21584 Posts |
I agree with 1916D  |
|
Moderator
United States
187637 Posts |
I know we all want it to be a 1914-D, but it is most likely a 1916-D.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Everyone will agree the first 3 numbers are 191. However, it's that last digit that could be a 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 and on and on and on. However, for sure it's not a 1.  |
|
Valued Member
Russian Federation
417 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
54280 Posts |
It CAN NOT be a 1914-D with the mint mark in that spot.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1527 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
655 Posts |
Looks like a 14-S to me because the mm seems to be higher rather than wider. Especially, looks like an S in the 3rd pic.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
My first thought is an altered date tossed in a tumbler to disguise their work. The shiny red copper and the way LIBERTY and the date are so mushed out does not seem natural to me.
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,615 |
Posted 03/06/2018 08:41 am
