Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1916-D Lincoln Cent - Die Deterioration - Just For Fun

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,293Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3649 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2018  4:08 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I was going to post this a few weeks ago, but got busy. Seeing the other post on Die Deterioration reminded me to hunt down this pic and do this post.

Just for fun:

Where: Cherokee and Colfax, wedged between the politicians at City Hall and the County Jail. (Money always seems to connect politicians to jails, but I digress . . .)

When: Sometime in 1916.

"Hey. boss. This die looks kinda worn. Time to replace it?"

"Son, you don't know nothin'. She's got another 50,000 coins left in her yet. Keep on working and stop yapping."

"Sure thing, boss!"


1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun

There has to be a technical name for this type of Die Deterioration. I've always heard it called "metal flow deterioration," but that would not be correct, since the metal flow would be the result of the deterioration, and not the cause. The recessing near the mm and the strong flow lines from the date and mm are evident to the unaided eye. The rest of the obverse isn't much better. In contrast, on this coin, the reverse die is MDS, and the coin would grade VF based entirely on wear on the reverse.

I snagged this in a regional show for "Hey, how about throwing in that ugly '16-D along with this one?" The freebie price was right, anyway.

I thought it was just a decent example of the rather common mismatching of working die states in Denver in the early Lincoln series. That's part of the charm of the early Lincolns, but also why it is so danged hard to find a well-struck 1911-1933 Denver Lincoln with good eye appeal.

EDIT: Here are two more pics of the motto and Liberty. Note the "Hook 'em Horns" on the "T"s in "Trust" and the weakness toward the rim in "Liberty." There is also evident deterioration close to the portrait.

1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun

1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun
Edited by fortcollins
04/02/2018 6:54 pm
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
74279 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2018  5:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow! They let that die strike a ton of coins I can tell. Pretty interesting too! It's in a VLDS (Very Late Die State). I also can see a Die Crack forming on the 1 in 1916. It looks like it was going to form a huge Die Chip.
Errers and Varietys.
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3649 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2018  7:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Errers and Varietys, thanks! I hadn't noticed the crack on the second "1". Good eyes!

We have solid data from 1913 (David Lange) and 1915 (The Numismatist as well as Lange) that Denver struck about 150,000 cents per die pair. The 1911-1912-1913 Denver cents were struck weakly. The (very slightly) sharper strikes of 1914-1915-1916 seem to have come at the expense of increased die wear in 1915 and 1916, with 1914 spared probably because of the low mintage. Even so, I have a hard time believing that this die only struck 150,000 coins, especially considering the soft alloy issues evident for this date.
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
74279 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2018  7:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Errers and Varietys, thanks! I hadn't noticed the crack on the second "1". Good eyes!


You're very welcome!


Quote:
We have solid data from 1913 (David Lange) and 1915 (The Numismatist as well as Lange) that Denver struck about 150,000 cents per die pair. The 1911-1912-1913 Denver cents were struck weakly. The (very slightly) sharper strikes of 1914-1915-1916 seem to have come at the expense of increased die wear in 1915 and 1916, with 1914 spared probably because of the low mintage. Even so, I have a hard time believing that this die only struck 150,000 coins, especially considering the soft alloy issues evident for this date.


Very interesting information! Thank you very much! I also don't believe they struck 150,000 coins. They probably struck way more than that, considering how worn the die was on this Very Late Die State example of this 1916 D Lincoln Wheat cent.
Errers and Varietys.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2018  9:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
During the teens there was a rash of die wear that was in the opposite direction. On the inside of the date devices? (1911-1918)Wide rim era with no VDB/one year with the VDB on the shoulder.
It all started because of this coin. I thought it would be the first 1913-S RPM. But Chuck Daughtrey realized it was a die wear issue, but in the opposite direction. I wondered if they were all that way, but there were not. Just in certain die states. So here is part of what I found those years.
1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun
1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun
1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun
1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun
1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun
1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun
1916-D-Lincoln-Cent---Die-Deterioration---Just-For-Fun
CoopHome 1911-1917 die wear cents
Edited by coop
04/02/2018 9:11 pm
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
74279 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2018  9:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting Die State progression Coop! Thank you very much for making it and sharing it! This would make an excellent learning tool for people who just started to get in the coin collecting hobby.
Errers and Varietys.
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3649 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2018  10:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
coop, that's awesome! The photos are great and show the progression well.

I've always thought that the early Denver cents and nickels reflected that mint's inexperience with striking subsidiary coins (and resultant tinkering with the amount of force needed for the harder metals), but seeing the same deterioration on Philadelphia cents definitely points to design issues. Very helpful info, and educational as always.

Thanks!
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2018  10:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Most of the doubled dies that we are finding are form the Philadelphia mint. I feel there is an issue with the hubbing process creating so many more die varieties. Just a few from Denver. Its like that machine is worn out and need to be replaced. If they did that, the doubled dies would probably be reduced most of the time. When I made the thread on the shield cents from Wexler's site, the number of doubled dies for the cents were almost all from the Philadelphia mint. For all the images I used, only one was from Denver.
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,293Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums