| Author |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,915 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
211 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34397 Posts |
@jay, can you please give us a close-up of that first pic? Looks Ottoman to me.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
211 Posts |
@Spence... this work? 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
211 Posts |
The coin is very small and concave/convex... very cool coin actually.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
211 Posts |
@Spence... Wow dude you got it bro! I found a pic on google after you suggested Ottoman! Your right! Here it is!....  Thanks a ton!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
211 Posts |
It is a "Kurush" from the Ottoman Empire...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7935 Posts |
The Ottoman coin shown in your MA Shops photo is from a different year, AH1203, and would be very large, 42 mm, which is larger than a Morgan.
The Ottoman silver para dated 1223 as suggested by Numisma is 12 mm, or smaller than a dime. That's more consistent with the coin photographed on a fingertip.
Edited by tdziemia 08/04/2019 3:53 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
 1 para, Qustantiniyah mint, accession year AH 1223, regnal year 3.
|
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,915 |
|