| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,137 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
A gentleman brought this coin by for me to take a look at it. This one has fake written all over it. Nothing looks right about this coin. Anyway here's what I know. It is not magnetic, the weight is 25.94, diameter is correct, the coin was a little thicker and there was no visible die marker at the T in Liberty. I want the gentleman to hear it from the experts, which I am not.    |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7001 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
One-look fake. To start, MM shape and tilt are dead wrong.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7613 Posts |
The toning around the lettering screams Chinese fake to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5661 Posts |
Definitely counterfeit. 1893-S only used one obverse die, and the date position of this coin is way off.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5393 Posts |
Fake , looks cast just like the 1895 S you posted
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12477 Posts |
Boy, look at the surfaces in that closeup!  In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Looks like a cast fake. And a cleaned cast fake... Stay away from this one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36575 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
54280 Posts |
100%, without a single doubt, counterfeit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
992 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
663 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3628 Posts |
I agree with the upthread comments. China 1.0 counterfeit. The reeding will be another giveaway. It will have been applied after strike by a Castaing-type machine, and will look way off.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18640 Posts |
 counterfeit |
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,137 |
|
Posted 07/23/2020 10:44 pm
