| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,898 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
824 Posts |
I just received this coin and wondering your thoughts?  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
Tough coin! Would love to claim my Hoard of '82s had the quarter and half, but alas...
|
|
Valued Member
Sweden
146 Posts |
The reverse looks great! I'm really not the right person to put a grade on this serie but I'd say AU58.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say impaired proof PR-58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
To me the obverse looks like it had an old cleaning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7626 Posts |
Lightly circulated proof.
You can't beat the 1879 to 1891 half dollars for a challenging set to put together....especially the circulation strikes!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1213 Posts |
I agree that the front looks cleaned, but the reverse is beautiful. I'd give it a 58 also.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
I'd say PF58 as well, old cleaning, good looking coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
 PF58
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I'd guess AU55 with a light cleaning. I'm not seeing a proof but apparently others do. Here's a PR55 for comparison.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3662 Posts |
It's an impaired proof. The die marriage looks to be WB-102, with the stray "88" in denticles. IIRC, that die variety is believed to be proof only. PR-58, with a market acceptable older cleaning. Nice coin! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
824 Posts |
Quote: The die marriage looks to be WB-102, with the stray "88" in denticles. IIRC, that die variety is believed to be proof only. fortcollins, yes you are correct. I was going to take another picture of the part that you highlighted because my images are bad and hard to see. It is a WB-102.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,898 |
|