| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,584 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1998 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Has the look of an older cleaning? John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5887 Posts |
Looks EF-40, but the lack of diamonds leans me towards VF-35. Overall the coin looks very nice so EF-40.
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
992 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I'm at EF-40 but I tend to agree with john1 on the old time cleaning . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3156 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5663 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2156 Posts |
XF-40 IMO, and I do see a slight old cleaning but it doesn't affect the coin much at all.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2333 Posts |
I like it! EF40 for me as well smat
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18644 Posts |
for me this is a tweener. XF40/45 and could go either way. I never grade a coin by just one marker. the overall look of the coin to me looks right between them. the coin may have had an old cleaning but I believe it grades straight
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36638 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,584 |
|