| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 2,906 |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
Not a coin I plan on buying, but this is another coin I thought was interesting. I have my thoughts on this coin, and know what PCGS thinks, so what do you think?   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1427 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7621 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Lebanon
506 Posts |
AU50
Edited by chronos
11/18/2020 5:50 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Being famously bad at grading these, I'll say AU-55+.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
I'm with westernsky, AU50. Old cleaning but probably passed as market acceptable.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7049 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18681 Posts |
PCGS AU50. I think its closer to 53
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5674 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5029 Posts |
Coin looks dead.
AU53. I would say it appears to have been cleaned at some point. I am not certain if it would have gotten a details label or considered market acceptable.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6586 Posts |
What the hay I'll say MS-62
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
824 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1775 Posts |
Based on what Grape posts, not looking at what I actually think it grades, I will say MS-63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
Scopru, I'm willing to bet this is a GC auction picture, GC has a habit of overexposing their pictures to the point of making coins(especially circulated XF/AU coins) look cleaned, dull, and lifeless. Here's a picture of a bust half I had compared to the GC picture.   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5029 Posts |
Thanks for that info adam.  |
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,906 |
Posted 11/18/2020 01:08 am
