| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,401 |
|
|
New Member
United States
10 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1427 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
 Pretty neat example. Got a reverse pic?
|
|
New Member
 United States
10 Posts |
Here is the reverse side I can try to get a side pic as well. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
It's a bit strange the reverse rim looks so good compared to the obverse. Must have been rolling around at an angle EDIT: Here's a good topic on Dryer Coins...... http://goccf.com/t/143863
Edited by Rothery 01/26/2021 11:42 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
10 Posts |
I thank you all for your input. I'm here to learn on what I have as well as to share a very therapeutic hobby with others with the same interest.
|
|
New Member
 United States
10 Posts |
Here is a side view of this 1958 Jefferson nickel. I just thought after seeing the pics of the other Dryer Coins this one is quite different. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
We might need coop or Mike on this one. Also a weight please. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10044 Posts |
I have never seen one like that. Its surely PMD, but I have to wonder if its from some other mechanical process? Tumbling in a dryer would have to give it a more symmetric raising of the edge. Its like the old math homework assigned to kids to flip a penny 100 times and record how many times it lands as heads or tails. It will always be around 50/50. This coin, if in a dryer being altered, would have simply been being swept up and dropped on its edge according to the same laws of probability and should not have had one edge more rolled over than the other unless some other unknown factor was involved. As has been linked to already, here is my Dryer Coins 101 thread: http://goccf.com/t/143863
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
Edited by Earle42 01/28/2021 7:29 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
10 Posts |
Sorry it took me so long to respond but, I had to purchase a new scale. The digital read out was no longer avail. The new scale, I took some pics of it on "g" setting reads 5.2 for the 1958 Jefferson nickel and the read out for 5.0 for a 1990 Jefferson nickel. I thought this might help some more. Again thanks so much for all the input you all have given. I'm hoping the pic uploads soon.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
Quote:Here is a side view of this 1958 Jefferson nickel. I just thought after seeing the pics of the other Dryer Coins this one is quite different. That's for sure - never saw anything like that either....
|
|
New Member
 United States
10 Posts |
I thought so as well it actually looks as if it was pressed only half way squeezed the face of the collar up and its the size of a dime. But the reverse side is right. That's why I am asking because its very different.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Used some type of machine on it after being struck. Note the obverse devices are covered over post strike. The outside edge of the coin is not exactly round. The collar would have left the edge circular. Altered coin.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,401 |
|